Search (13198 results, page 1 of 660)

  1. Weisel, L.; Fisch, C.: Wert der Information: Ware oder öffentliches Gut : Hearing zur Umsetzung der Urheberrechtsrichtlinie der EU in das Urheberrechtsgesetz (2002) 0.48 
    0.4764439 = product of:
  0.9528878 = sum of:
    0.038717575 = weight(_text_:und in 258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038717575 = score(doc=258,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13166797 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        0.29405463 = fieldWeight in 258, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=258)
    0.9141702 = weight(_text_:hearing in 258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.9141702 = score(doc=258,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.53799975 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.06241 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        1.699202 = fieldWeight in 258, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          9.06241 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=258)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Bericht über ein Hearing am 30.11.2001 in Berlin
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 53(2002) H.2, S.102-104
  2. Schmitz, H.: Was eigentlich alles ist Information : ... und wie soll ein 'Druckwerk', vom Buch bis zum Video, archiviert und zugänglich gemacht werden? (1987) 0.29 
    0.29215452 = product of:
  0.58430904 = sum of:
    0.045629106 = weight(_text_:und in 3179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045629106 = score(doc=3179,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13166797 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        0.34654674 = fieldWeight in 3179, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3179)
    0.53867996 = weight(_text_:hearing in 3179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.53867996 = score(doc=3179,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.53799975 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.06241 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        1.0012643 = fieldWeight in 3179, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.06241 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3179)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Bericht über ein Hearing in der Deutschen Bibliothek zur Frage des Sammelauftrages für die verschiedenen Medien
  3. Judge, A.J.N.: Representation of sets : the role of number (1979) 0.27 
    0.26875663 = product of:
  0.53751326 = sum of:
    0.47045246 = weight(_text_:judge in 73) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.47045246 = score(doc=73,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4589696 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        1.0250188 = fieldWeight in 73, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=73)
    0.06706082 = weight(_text_:und in 73) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06706082 = score(doc=73,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13166797 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        0.50931764 = fieldWeight in 73, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=73)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Klassifikation und Erkenntnis I. Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 1 "Klassifikation und Wissensgewinnung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979
  4. Rügenhagen, M.; Beck, T.S.; Sartorius, E.J.: Information integrity in the era of Fake News : an experiment using library guidelines to judge information integrity (2020) 0.17 
    0.16972335 = product of:
  0.3394467 = sum of:
    0.31363496 = weight(_text_:judge in 1114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31363496 = score(doc=1114,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4589696 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        0.68334585 = fieldWeight in 1114, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1114)
    0.025811719 = weight(_text_:und in 1114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025811719 = score(doc=1114,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13166797 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        0.19603643 = fieldWeight in 1114, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1114)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 44(2020) H.1, S.34-53
  5. Dahlberg, I. (Bearb.): Klassifikation und Erkenntnis I : Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 1 "Klassifikation und Wissensgewinnung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979 (1979) 0.16 
    0.16487648 = product of:
  0.32975295 = sum of:
    0.2744306 = weight(_text_:judge in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2744306 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4589696 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        0.59792763 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
    0.05532235 = weight(_text_:und in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05532235 = score(doc=749,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.13166797 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        0.42016557 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: SCHEELE, M. Der Mensch als Voraussetzung und als Ziel der Klassifikationsforschung; JUDGE, A.J.N.: Representation of sets: the role of number; DAHLBERG, W.: Zur Geometrie der Grundbegriffe; MERTENS, P.: Die Theorie der Mustererkennung in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften; HANSERT, E.: Statistik als Methodik zur Konstruktion von Wissen; SCHWENDTKE; A.: Wissenschaftssystematik und Scientometrologie; HENRICHS, N.: Gegenstandstheoretische Grundlagen der Bibliotheksklassifikation?; FUGMANN, R. u. J.H. WINTER: Durch mechanisierte Klassifikation zum Analogieschluss; GREITER, F., G. GUTTMANN, E. OESER: Die Rolle der Klassifikation bei der Entwicklung und Bewertung neuer Produkte
  6. Flagg, G.: At Senate hearing, librarians seek their place on the information highway (1994) 0.15 
    0.1523617 = product of:
  0.6094468 = sum of:
    0.6094468 = weight(_text_:hearing in 72) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.6094468 = score(doc=72,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.53799975 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.06241 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        1.1328013 = fieldWeight in 72, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          9.06241 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=72)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Reports the hearing on libraries and their role in the information infrastructure held by the Senate Subcommittee on Education, Arts and Humanities on 19 Apr 1994 and timed to coincide with National Library Week and Legislative Day. Contributions highlighted the degree to which library services in libraries throughout the USA are enhanced by electronic data transmission and the urgent need on the part of libraries for support from federal government with funding their policies
  7. Ockenfeld, M.: Zugang zu Informationen aus öffentlichen Beständen : Chancen für Bibliotheken, Dokumentationsstellen, Informationsvermittler (2000) 0.13 
    0.13354771 = product of:
  0.26709542 = sum of:
    0.051623438 = weight(_text_:und in 6503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051623438 = score(doc=6503,freq=32.0), product of:
        0.13166797 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        0.39207286 = fieldWeight in 6503, product of:
          5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
            32.0 = termFreq=32.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6503)
    0.21547198 = weight(_text_:hearing in 6503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21547198 = score(doc=6503,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.53799975 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.06241 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        0.40050572 = fieldWeight in 6503, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.06241 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44421)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6503)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Der Zugang zu Informationen des öffentlichen Sektors ist seit den 80er Jahren des 20. Jahrhunderts ein Thema, das die Europäische Kommission und nationale Regierungen beschäftigte. Die rasante Durchdringung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft mit informationstechnischen Einrichtungen hat seine Bedeutung wachsen lassen. Aufgrund leerer öffentlicher Kassen wächst das Interesse daran auch unter den beiden Gesichtspunkten Einsparung von Personal für Recherchen und Auskünfte in der öffentlichen Verwaltung sowie Vermarktung von Informationen des öffentlichen Sektors, und dies nicht nur auf der nationalen, sondern auch auf der internationalen Bühne. Dies wurde beispielsweise durch die explizite Aufnahme dieses Themas in das Europäische INFO 2000-Programm von 1996 deutlich, in dein der Zugang zu und zum ersten Mal auch die Vermarktung von Informationen des öffentlichen Sektors, eine wichtige Aktionslinie wurden. Im Rahmen dieses Programms stellte die Kommission Mitte 1996 den ersten Entwurf des Grünbuches zum Thema Informationen des öffentlichen Sektors fertig Anfang 1999 wurde es dann nach vielen Überarbeitungen veröffentlicht. Behandelt werden vorrangig Fragen des Datenschutzes, des Urheberrechts, der Haftung, der Zugangsrechte und der Vermarktung. Es folgte eine breite öffentliche Diskussion. Zwei von insgesamt 14 Diskussionsveranstaltungen fanden im Mai 1999 in Deutschland statt. Am 25. Mai gab es in Brüssel ein öffentliches Hearing, an dem etwa zweihundert Interessierte aus ganz Europa teilnahmen, die Hälfte davon aus Belgien, nur sieben aus Deutschland. Ferner sammelte die Kommission bis Oktober 1999 schriftliche Stellungnahmen, die größtenteils auch im WWW zugänglich sind (http://156.169.50.95:10080/info2000/en/publicsector/gp_comments.html). Aus Deutschland kamen insgesamt fünfzehn Beiträge, neben Privatpersonen und Anwaltskanzleien u.a. vorn Verband Deutscher Zeitschriftenverleger, den Ländern Brandenburg und Rheinland-Pfalz, dem Deutschen Dachverband für Geoinformation, der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Vermessungsverwaltungen der Länder (AdV) sowie ARD und ZDF
    Series
    Gemeinsamer Kongress der Bundesvereinigung Deutscher Bibliotheksverbände e.V. (BDB) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. (DGI); Bd.1)(Tagungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V.; Bd.3
    Source
    Information und Öffentlichkeit: 1. Gemeinsamer Kongress der Bundesvereinigung Deutscher Bibliotheksverbände e.V. (BDB) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. (DGI), Leipzig, 20.-23.3.2000. Zugleich 90. Deutscher Bibliothekartag, 52. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. (DGI). Hrsg.: G. Ruppelt u. H. Neißer
  8. Fountain, J.F.: Headings for children's materials : an LCSH/Sears companion (1993) 0.12 
    0.117613114 = product of:
  0.47045246 = sum of:
    0.47045246 = weight(_text_:judge in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.47045246 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4589696 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        1.0250188 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Public library quarterly 15(1996) no.1, S.65-66 (A.L. Judge)
  9. Nixon, G.; Skinner, H.: Access to information and video services for the deaf community in Cheshire (1995) 0.11 
    0.10773599 = product of:
  0.43094397 = sum of:
    0.43094397 = weight(_text_:hearing in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.43094397 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.53799975 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.06241 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        0.80101144 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.06241 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In April 93 the Cheshire Library Service and the Cheshire Deaf society, UK began collaboration on a project to satisfy the information needs of deaf and hard of hearing people. Describes the aims and objectives of the project, the Carnegie Bulletin Board, the installation of personal computers, the use of videophone technology, deaf awreness trainig, the video lending service for the deaf, the input of the National Captioning Institute, and a survey of user needs
  10. Auer, S.; Oelen, A.; Haris, A.M.; Stocker, M.; D'Souza, J.; Farfar, K.E.; Vogt, L.; Prinz, M.; Wiens, V.; Jaradeh, M.Y.: Improving access to scientific literature with knowledge graphs : an experiment using library guidelines to judge information integrity (2020) 0.11 
    0.10607709 = product of:
  0.21215418 = sum of:
    0.19602185 = weight(_text_:judge in 1317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19602185 = score(doc=1317,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4589696 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        0.42709115 = fieldWeight in 1317, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1317)
    0.016132325 = weight(_text_:und in 1317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016132325 = score(doc=1317,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13166797 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        0.12252277 = fieldWeight in 1317, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1317)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 44(2020) H.3, S.516-529
  11. Maxwell, T.A.: Mapping information policy frames : the politics of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (2004) 0.08 
    0.080801986 = product of:
  0.32320794 = sum of:
    0.32320794 = weight(_text_:hearing in 3063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32320794 = score(doc=3063,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.53799975 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.06241 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        0.60075855 = fieldWeight in 3063, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.06241 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3063)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Passage of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) was a significant milestone in congressional information policy legislation. However, the results were widely criticized in some circles as providing too much Power to certain stakeholder groups. This paper uses computerbased content analysis and a theoretical taxonomy of information policy values to analyze congressional hearing testimony. The results of document coding were then analyzed using a variety of statistical tools to map how different stakeholders framed issues in the debate and determine if congressional value statements about the legislation conformed more closely to certain stakeholders. Results of the analysis indicate that significant differences in the use of information policy terms occurred across stakeholders, and showed varying degrees of convergence between congressional or other stakeholders when framing information policy issues.
  12. Dubnov, S.; McAdams, S.; Reynolds, R.: Structural and affective aspects of music from statistical audio signal analysis (2006) 0.08 
    0.080801986 = product of:
  0.32320794 = sum of:
    0.32320794 = weight(_text_:hearing in 11) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32320794 = score(doc=11,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.53799975 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.06241 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        0.60075855 = fieldWeight in 11, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.06241 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=11)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Understanding and modeling human experience and emotional response when listening to music are important for better understanding of the stylistic choices in musical composition. In this work, we explore the relation of audio signal structure to human perceptual and emotional reactions. Memory, repetition, and anticipatory structure have been suggested as some of the major factors in music that might influence and possibly shape these responses. The audio analysis was conducted on two recordings of an extended contemporary musical composition by one of the authors. Signal properties were analyzed using statistical analyses of signal similarities over time and information theoretic measures of signal redundancy. They were then compared to Familiarity Rating and Emotional Force profiles, as recorded continually by listeners hearing the two versions of the piece in a live-concert setting. The analysis shows strong evidence that signal properties and human reactions are related, suggesting applications of these techniques to music understanding and music information-retrieval systems.
  13. Sargent, S.: Jurgen Habermas and the ethics of gatekeeping (1993) 0.08 
    0.080801986 = product of:
  0.32320794 = sum of:
    0.32320794 = weight(_text_:hearing in 676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32320794 = score(doc=676,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.53799975 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.06241 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        0.60075855 = fieldWeight in 676, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.06241 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=676)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Collection development theory has generally neglected issues of fairness in the treatment of materials dealing with politics, religion, and other controversial subjects. The communication theory of Jurgen Habermas is proposed as a basis for a rational policy, and for dealing with difficult cases. It is suggested that as ideological conflict becomes less important in the relations between religious groups, it will be more acceptable for libraries to serve the particular religious interest of specific communities, rather than to treat religions as interest groups that, like political parties, should get "equal time" at all libraries. It is further argued that religious fundamentalism and "creation science" are not entitled in the library to "equal time" with science, since our society has made a provisional decision that such questions are most appropriately answered by conventional science. When the status of science is itself the issue, however, its critics from religion and elsewhere are entitled to a respectful and equitable hearing.
  14. Tenopir, C.; Jascó, P.: Quality of abstracts (1993) 0.08 
    0.07840874 = product of:
  0.31363496 = sum of:
    0.31363496 = weight(_text_:judge in 5025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31363496 = score(doc=5025,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4589696 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        0.68334585 = fieldWeight in 5025, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5025)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Abstracts enable users to judge the relevance of articles, provide a summary and may be a substitute for the original document. Defines abstracts and considers who they are written be according to the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and other sources. Distinguishes between indicative and informative abstracts. Informative abstracts are preferred by ANSI and ERIC. Discusses the content and procedures for abstracting, writing style, tests of quality and readability and informativeness. Presents statistics analyzing abstracts from 3 general interest databases and on abstract length and type
  15. Tenner, R.: ¬An implosion of knowledge? : the quality of information is not keeping up with the quntity (1993) 0.08 
    0.07840874 = product of:
  0.31363496 = sum of:
    0.31363496 = weight(_text_:judge in 7870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31363496 = score(doc=7870,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4589696 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        0.68334585 = fieldWeight in 7870, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7870)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Describes the information explosion and poses the question of whether the explosion is driving an equal and opposite information implosion. Uses 4 criteria to judge whether available information has become better or worse: cost, ease or difficulty of access; variety of sources; and clarity. Concludes that none of these have improved over the last generation
  16. Judge, A.J.N.: Envisaging the art of navigating conceptual complexity : in search of software combining artistic and conceptual insights (1995) 0.08 
    0.07840874 = product of:
  0.31363496 = sum of:
    0.31363496 = weight(_text_:judge in 1153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31363496 = score(doc=1153,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4589696 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        0.68334585 = fieldWeight in 1153, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1153)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  17. Denning, R.; Shuttleworth, M.; Smith, P.: Interface design concepts in the development of a Web-based information retrieval system (1998) 0.08 
    0.07840874 = product of:
  0.31363496 = sum of:
    0.31363496 = weight(_text_:judge in 2004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31363496 = score(doc=2004,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4589696 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        0.68334585 = fieldWeight in 2004, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2004)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Präsentation folgender Gestaltungsprinzipien: (1) Help the user develop an understanding of the operation of the interface and the search process; (2) Provide information to help users judge the value of continuing a search path; (3) Assist the user in refining the search query or search topic; (4) Provide verbal labels suggestive of meaning
  18. Judge, A.J.N.: Strategic correspondences : computer-aided insight scaffolding (1996) 0.08 
    0.07840874 = product of:
  0.31363496 = sum of:
    0.31363496 = weight(_text_:judge in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31363496 = score(doc=3816,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4589696 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        0.68334585 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  19. Pal, S.; Mitra, M.; Kamps, J.: Evaluation effort, reliability and reusability in XML retrieval (2011) 0.07 
    0.06930419 = product of:
  0.27721676 = sum of:
    0.27721676 = weight(_text_:judge in 197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.27721676 = score(doc=197,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.4589696 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        0.6039981 = fieldWeight in 197, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=197)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The Initiative for the Evaluation of XML retrieval (INEX) provides a TREC-like platform for evaluating content-oriented XML retrieval systems. Since 2007, INEX has been using a set of precision-recall based metrics for its ad hoc tasks. The authors investigate the reliability and robustness of these focused retrieval measures, and of the INEX pooling method. They explore four specific questions: How reliable are the metrics when assessments are incomplete, or when query sets are small? What is the minimum pool/query-set size that can be used to reliably evaluate systems? Can the INEX collections be used to fairly evaluate "new" systems that did not participate in the pooling process? And, for a fixed amount of assessment effort, would this effort be better spent in thoroughly judging a few queries, or in judging many queries relatively superficially? The authors' findings validate properties of precision-recall-based metrics observed in document retrieval settings. Early precision measures are found to be more error-prone and less stable under incomplete judgments and small topic-set sizes. They also find that system rankings remain largely unaffected even when assessment effort is substantially (but systematically) reduced, and confirm that the INEX collections remain usable when evaluating nonparticipating systems. Finally, they observe that for a fixed amount of effort, judging shallow pools for many queries is better than judging deep pools for a smaller set of queries. However, when judging only a random sample of a pool, it is better to completely judge fewer topics than to partially judge many topics. This result confirms the effectiveness of pooling methods.
  20. Borko, H.; Chatman, S.: Criteria for acceptable abstracts : a survey of abstractors' instructions (1963) 0.07 
    0.06860765 = product of:
  0.2744306 = sum of:
    0.2744306 = weight(_text_:judge in 686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2744306 = score(doc=686,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4589696 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059366077 = queryNorm
        0.59792763 = fieldWeight in 686, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=686)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The need for criteria by which to judge the adequacy of an abstract is felt most strongly when evaluating machine-produced abstracts. In order to develop a set of criteria, a survey was conducted of the instructions prepared by various scientific publications as a guide to their abstracters in the preparation of copy. One-hundred-and-thirty sets of instructions were analyzed and compared as to their function, content, and form. It was concluded that, while differences in subject matter do not necessarily require different kinds of abstracts, there are significant variations between the informative and the indicative abstract. A set of criteria for the writing of an acceptable abstract of science literature was derived. The adequacy of these criteria is still to be validated, and the athors' plans for fututre research in this area are specified

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 9358
  • m 2220
  • el 1004
  • x 591
  • s 553
  • i 168
  • r 117
  • ? 66
  • n 55
  • b 47
  • l 23
  • p 22
  • h 17
  • d 15
  • u 14
  • fi 10
  • v 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • ms 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications