-
Cheti, A.: ¬Il GRIS dall'elaborazione alla sperimentazione (1997)
0.09
0.0926081 = product of:
0.3704324 = sum of:
0.3704324 = weight(_text_:heading in 2168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3704324 = score(doc=2168,freq=4.0), product of:
0.39192855 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.06479252 = queryNorm
0.9451529 = fieldWeight in 2168, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2168)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Discusses the work of GRIS, a collaborative project of Italian academic and research libraries, to develop subject heading schemes for Italian libraries, resulting in the recent publication of the 'Guida all'indicizzazione per soggetto'
- Object
- GRIS subject heading scheme
-
Didszun, P.: ¬Die "Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog" (RSWK) als universale deutsche Indexierungssprache in semiotischer Perspektive (2012)
0.09
0.091894194 = product of:
0.18378839 = sum of:
0.052820764 = weight(_text_:und in 1652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052820764 = score(doc=1652,freq=18.0), product of:
0.14370327 = queryWeight, product of:
2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
0.06479252 = queryNorm
0.36756828 = fieldWeight in 1652, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1652)
0.13096763 = weight(_text_:heading in 1652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13096763 = score(doc=1652,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39192855 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.06479252 = queryNorm
0.334162 = fieldWeight in 1652, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1652)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Die Welt der Information ist zunehmend vernetzt. Quellen aller Art werden in digitaler Form über das Internet verbreitet. Die inhaltliche Erschließung dieser Quellen durch Schlagwörter bietet dem Nutzer, insbesondere dem Wissenschaftler, einen unentbehrlichen thematischen Zugang zu diesen Quellen. Die "Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog" (RSWK) sind das maßgebende Regelwerk für die verbale Inhaltserschließung im deutschsprachigen Raum. Sie sind zugleich in der bibliotheks- und informationswissenschaftlichen Fachwelt kontrovers diskutiert worden. Dennoch fehlt bislang eine wissenschaftliche monographische Darstellung der RSWK. Die Arbeit will einen Beitrag dazu leisten, indem sie die durch dieses Regelwerk bestimmte Indexierungssprache als Zeichensystem in seiner semantischen, syntaktischen und pragmatischen Dimension analysiert. Die theoretische Grundlage der Arbeit bietet die Semiotik von Charles Morris. Ausgehend davon wird der Typus der Indexierungssprache unter zeichentheoretischen Gesichtspunkten dargestellt. Für die konkrete Analyse der RSWK als Schlagwortsprache werden dann zwei auf der internationalen Ebene der bibliothekarischen Wissensorganisation vorgelegte Unternehmungen als Analyseinstrumente herangezogen, nämlich einmal die "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" (FRBR und zum anderen die "Principles underlying subject heading languages" Gestützt auf die Ergebnisse dieser Untersuchungen wird die RSWK als Schlagwortsprache im Hinblick auf ihre theoretische Angemessenheit und Konsistenz untersucht. Die Analyse kennzeichnet die RSWK als synthetische kettenbildende Schlagwortsprache mit ihren drei charakteristischen Ebenen: dem Schlagwort, der Schlagwortkette und dem Indexat als der Gesamtheit der Schlagwortketten. Es werden semiotische Defizite dieser Schlagwortsprache im Hinblick auf ihre Vollständigkeit und Widerspruchsfreiheit aufgezeigt und entsprechende Vorschläge für ihre Weiterentwicklung gewonnen. Weitere Abschnitte widmen sich dann einzelnen Schlagwortkategorien und den durch sie repräsentierten bibliographischen Entitäten: den Körperschaften, den Ereignissen und den Werken.
-
School library reference services in the 90s : where we are, where we're heading (1994)
0.09
0.091677345 = product of:
0.36670938 = sum of:
0.36670938 = weight(_text_:heading in 2517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.36670938 = score(doc=2517,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39192855 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.06479252 = queryNorm
0.9356536 = fieldWeight in 2517, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2517)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Studwell, W.E.; Rolland-Thomas, P.: ¬The form and structure of a subject heading code (1988)
0.09
0.091677345 = product of:
0.36670938 = sum of:
0.36670938 = weight(_text_:heading in 2784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.36670938 = score(doc=2784,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39192855 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.06479252 = queryNorm
0.9356536 = fieldWeight in 2784, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2784)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Dhawan, S.M.; Yerkey, A.N.: Trends in subject heading assignment in cataloging records during 1974-1978 (1983)
0.09
0.091677345 = product of:
0.36670938 = sum of:
0.36670938 = weight(_text_:heading in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.36670938 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39192855 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.06479252 = queryNorm
0.9356536 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Ho, J.: ¬An analysis of the structure of a subject heading list (1993)
0.09
0.091677345 = product of:
0.36670938 = sum of:
0.36670938 = weight(_text_:heading in 6855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.36670938 = score(doc=6855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39192855 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.06479252 = queryNorm
0.9356536 = fieldWeight in 6855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6855)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Studwell, W.E.: Library of Congress Subject Heading period subdivisions for Australia, New Zealand and selected world islands : some proposed additions (1985)
0.09
0.091677345 = product of:
0.36670938 = sum of:
0.36670938 = weight(_text_:heading in 896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.36670938 = score(doc=896,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39192855 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.06479252 = queryNorm
0.9356536 = fieldWeight in 896, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=896)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Studwell, W.E.; Rast, E.; Felmlee, C.: Library of Congress Subject Heading period subdivisions for Africa : some proposed additions (1984)
0.09
0.091677345 = product of:
0.36670938 = sum of:
0.36670938 = weight(_text_:heading in 453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.36670938 = score(doc=453,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39192855 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.06479252 = queryNorm
0.9356536 = fieldWeight in 453, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=453)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Ranganathan, S.R.: Subject headings and facet analysis (1964)
0.09
0.09073704 = product of:
0.36294815 = sum of:
0.36294815 = weight(_text_:heading in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.36294815 = score(doc=1833,freq=6.0), product of:
0.39192855 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.06479252 = queryNorm
0.9260569 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- After establishing the terminology, shows how the choice of the name of the subject of a document and the rendering of the name in the heading of the specific subject entry can be got by facet analysis based on postulates and principles. After showing that subject headings constitute an artificial language, points out that using facet analysis for subject heading does not amount to using class number. Marks out the area for an objective statistical survey of sought heading for subject entry. Calls on Council for Library Resources Incorporated to provide for this project
-
USMARC format for authority data : including guidelines for content designation (1993)
0.09
0.09073704 = product of:
0.36294815 = sum of:
0.36294815 = weight(_text_:heading in 3713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.36294815 = score(doc=3713,freq=6.0), product of:
0.39192855 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.06479252 = queryNorm
0.9260569 = fieldWeight in 3713, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3713)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Includes changes to all examples throughout the publication, as approved by MARBI in January 1993. Makes obsolete the second indicator position (non-filing characters) in all of the heading fields except the 130, which is uniform titles. Also new to this edition: definition of 18X heading fields for general, geographic and chronological subdivision headings, plus related 48X and 58X fields... 7XX fields for heading-linking entries... and the control field 003, named the 'control number identifier.' Also eliminates the national-level requirement codes at the field level
-
Chan, L.M.: ¬The principle of uniform heading in descriptive cataloging : ideal and reality (1983)
0.09
0.09073704 = product of:
0.36294815 = sum of:
0.36294815 = weight(_text_:heading in 434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.36294815 = score(doc=434,freq=6.0), product of:
0.39192855 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.06479252 = queryNorm
0.9260569 = fieldWeight in 434, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=434)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The principle of uniform heading underlies the rules for headings in descriptive cataloging in the American tradition. The rationale and the evolution of the principle are examined and its implications discussed in terms of the history of cataloging codes. The ideal embodied in the principle of uniform heading has been undergoing gradual modification in recent codes and considerably compromised in cataloging practice today.
-
Stone, A.T.: ¬The LCSH century : a brief history of the Library of Congress Subject Headings, and introduction to the centennial essays (2000)
0.09
0.08914474 = product of:
0.17828947 = sum of:
0.021128306 = weight(_text_:und in 6600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021128306 = score(doc=6600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14370327 = queryWeight, product of:
2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
0.06479252 = queryNorm
0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 6600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6600)
0.15716116 = weight(_text_:heading in 6600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15716116 = score(doc=6600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39192855 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.06479252 = queryNorm
0.40099442 = fieldWeight in 6600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6600)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The history of the Library of Congress Subject Headings is traced, from its beginnings with the implementation of a dictionary catalog at the Library of Congress in 1898 to the present day. The author describes the most significant changes which have occurred in LCSH policies and practices during the 100-year period. Events noted near the end of the century indicate an increased willingness on the part of' the Library of Congress to involve the larger library community in the creation or revision of subject headings and other decision-making regarding the LCSH system. Finally, the author provides a summary of the other contributions to this collection of essays, a collection which celebrates the "centennial" of the world's most popular library subject heading language
- Content
- Mit einer Publikationsgeschichte der LCSH (vgl. Tabellen) und dazu gehörenden Publikationen
-
Landry, P.: Multilingual subject access : the linking approach of MACS (2004)
0.09
0.08914474 = product of:
0.17828947 = sum of:
0.021128306 = weight(_text_:und in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021128306 = score(doc=9,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14370327 = queryWeight, product of:
2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
0.06479252 = queryNorm
0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
0.15716116 = weight(_text_:heading in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15716116 = score(doc=9,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39192855 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.06479252 = queryNorm
0.40099442 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The MACS (Multilingual access to subjects) project is one of the many projects that are currently exploring solutions to multilingual subject access to online catalogs. Its strategy is to develop a Web based link and search interface through which equivalents between three Subject Heading Languages: SWD/RSWK (Schlagwortnormdatei/Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog) for German, RAMEAU (Repertoire d'Autorite-Matière Encyclopedique et Alphabetique Unifie) for French and LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings) for English can be created and maintained, and by which users can access online databases in the language of their choice. Factors that have lead to this approach will be examined and the MACS linking strategy will be explained. The trend to using mapping or linking strategies between different controlled vocabularies to create multilingual access challenges the traditional view of the multilingual thesaurus.
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: In pursuit of interoperability : can we standardize mapping types? (2011)
0.09
0.08914474 = product of:
0.17828947 = sum of:
0.021128306 = weight(_text_:und in 788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021128306 = score(doc=788,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14370327 = queryWeight, product of:
2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
0.06479252 = queryNorm
0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 788, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=788)
0.15716116 = weight(_text_:heading in 788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15716116 = score(doc=788,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39192855 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.06479252 = queryNorm
0.40099442 = fieldWeight in 788, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=788)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In the last few years projects such as DESIRE, MACS, CrissCross and KoMoHe have demonstrated the benefits as well as the challenges of mapping between controlled vocabularies. Each project has taken a slightly different approach to the definition and implementation of appropriate types of mapping. The mapping types supported by SKOS are slightly different again. In an ideal world, all major databases would be interconnected; all widely used thesauri, classification schemes and subject heading schemes would map to each other; and all of us would use the same basic types of mapping to enable universal interoperability. Or would we? This paper will discuss the feasibility and desirability of agreeing and implementing standardized mapping types.
- Series
- Bibliotheca Academica - Reihe Informations- und Bibliothekswissenschaften; Bd. 1
-
Tenopir, C.; Jascó, P.: Quality of abstracts (1993)
0.09
0.08557581 = product of:
0.34230325 = sum of:
0.34230325 = weight(_text_:judge in 5025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.34230325 = score(doc=5025,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5009224 = queryWeight, product of:
7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
0.06479252 = queryNorm
0.68334585 = fieldWeight in 5025, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5025)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Abstracts enable users to judge the relevance of articles, provide a summary and may be a substitute for the original document. Defines abstracts and considers who they are written be according to the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and other sources. Distinguishes between indicative and informative abstracts. Informative abstracts are preferred by ANSI and ERIC. Discusses the content and procedures for abstracting, writing style, tests of quality and readability and informativeness. Presents statistics analyzing abstracts from 3 general interest databases and on abstract length and type
-
Tenner, R.: ¬An implosion of knowledge? : the quality of information is not keeping up with the quntity (1993)
0.09
0.08557581 = product of:
0.34230325 = sum of:
0.34230325 = weight(_text_:judge in 7870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.34230325 = score(doc=7870,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5009224 = queryWeight, product of:
7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
0.06479252 = queryNorm
0.68334585 = fieldWeight in 7870, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7870)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Describes the information explosion and poses the question of whether the explosion is driving an equal and opposite information implosion. Uses 4 criteria to judge whether available information has become better or worse: cost, ease or difficulty of access; variety of sources; and clarity. Concludes that none of these have improved over the last generation
-
Judge, A.J.N.: Envisaging the art of navigating conceptual complexity : in search of software combining artistic and conceptual insights (1995)
0.09
0.08557581 = product of:
0.34230325 = sum of:
0.34230325 = weight(_text_:judge in 1153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.34230325 = score(doc=1153,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5009224 = queryWeight, product of:
7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
0.06479252 = queryNorm
0.68334585 = fieldWeight in 1153, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1153)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Denning, R.; Shuttleworth, M.; Smith, P.: Interface design concepts in the development of a Web-based information retrieval system (1998)
0.09
0.08557581 = product of:
0.34230325 = sum of:
0.34230325 = weight(_text_:judge in 2004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.34230325 = score(doc=2004,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5009224 = queryWeight, product of:
7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
0.06479252 = queryNorm
0.68334585 = fieldWeight in 2004, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2004)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Präsentation folgender Gestaltungsprinzipien: (1) Help the user develop an understanding of the operation of the interface and the search process; (2) Provide information to help users judge the value of continuing a search path; (3) Assist the user in refining the search query or search topic; (4) Provide verbal labels suggestive of meaning
-
Judge, A.J.N.: Strategic correspondences : computer-aided insight scaffolding (1996)
0.09
0.08557581 = product of:
0.34230325 = sum of:
0.34230325 = weight(_text_:judge in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.34230325 = score(doc=3816,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5009224 = queryWeight, product of:
7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
0.06479252 = queryNorm
0.68334585 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Svenonius, E.; McGarry, D.: Objectivity in evaluating subject heading assignment (1993)
0.08
0.07939491 = product of:
0.31757963 = sum of:
0.31757963 = weight(_text_:heading in 5611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.31757963 = score(doc=5611,freq=6.0), product of:
0.39192855 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.06479252 = queryNorm
0.8102998 = fieldWeight in 5611, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5611)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Recent papers have called attention to discrepancies in the assignment of LCSH. While philosophical arguments can be made that subject analysis, if not a logical impossibility, at least is point-of-view dependent, subject headings continue to be assigned and continue to be useful. The hypothesis advanced in the present project is that to a considerable degree there is a clear-cut right and wrong to LCSH subject heading assignment. To test the hypothesis, it was postulated that the assignment of a subject heading is correct if it is supported by textual warrant (at least 20% of the book being cataloged is on the topic) and is constructed in accordance with the LoC Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. A sample of 100 books on scientific subjects was used to test the hypothesis