Search (13188 results, page 1 of 660)

  1. Kluth, R.: Bibliothekswissenschaftliche Aspekte der Klassifikation : Entwicklungen und Tendenzen (1982) 0.41
    0.40858638 = product of:
      0.81717277 = sum of:
        0.06523828 = weight(_text_:und in 1750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06523828 = score(doc=1750,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12808958 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            0.50931764 = fieldWeight in 1750, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1750)
        0.75193447 = weight(_text_:hering in 1750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.75193447 = score(doc=1750,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.572312 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.909708 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            1.3138541 = fieldWeight in 1750, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.909708 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44421)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1750)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Series
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie: Sonderh.34
    Source
    Bestände in wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken. Erschließung und Erhaltung. Vorträge Bibliothekartag 1981 in Regensburg. Hrsg. von Jürgen Hering u. Eberhard Zwink
  2. Hering, J.: Retrospektive Katalogisierung (Altbestandserfassung) in den wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken der BR Deutschland (1991) 0.41
    0.40858638 = product of:
      0.81717277 = sum of:
        0.06523828 = weight(_text_:und in 2369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06523828 = score(doc=2369,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12808958 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            0.50931764 = fieldWeight in 2369, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2369)
        0.75193447 = weight(_text_:hering in 2369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.75193447 = score(doc=2369,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.572312 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.909708 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            1.3138541 = fieldWeight in 2369, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.909708 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44421)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2369)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Information gestern und morgen. Bibliotheken als wissenschaftliche Informations- und Servicezentren. Internationale Festschrift für Ferdinand Baumgartner zum 60. Geburtstag. Hrsg. von Ilse Dosoudil und Paul Rauchbauer
  3. Hitzenberger, L.: Intellektuelle Beschlagwortung versus automatische Stichwortvergabe : eine Evaluierungsstudie (1982) 0.40
    0.40260065 = product of:
      0.8052013 = sum of:
        0.053266827 = weight(_text_:und in 1534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053266827 = score(doc=1534,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12808958 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            0.41585606 = fieldWeight in 1534, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1534)
        0.75193447 = weight(_text_:hering in 1534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.75193447 = score(doc=1534,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.572312 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.909708 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            1.3138541 = fieldWeight in 1534, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.909708 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44421)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1534)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Series
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie: Sonderh.34
    Source
    Bestände in wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken: Erschließung und Erhaltung. 71. Deutscher Bibliothekartag in Regensburg, 9.-13.6.1981. Hrsg. von J. Hering u.a
  4. Judge, A.J.N.: Representation of sets : the role of number (1979) 0.26
    0.26145253 = product of:
      0.52290505 = sum of:
        0.45766678 = weight(_text_:judge in 73) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.45766678 = score(doc=73,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44649598 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            1.0250188 = fieldWeight in 73, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=73)
        0.06523828 = weight(_text_:und in 73) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06523828 = score(doc=73,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12808958 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            0.50931764 = fieldWeight in 73, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=73)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Klassifikation und Erkenntnis I. Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 1 "Klassifikation und Wissensgewinnung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979
  5. Hering, O.: EDV unterstützte Hilfen zur Sacherschließung phytomedizinischer Fachliteratur (1997) 0.24
    0.24387905 = product of:
      0.4877581 = sum of:
        0.04912965 = weight(_text_:und in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04912965 = score(doc=1012,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.12808958 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            0.38355696 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
        0.43862844 = weight(_text_:hering in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.43862844 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.572312 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.909708 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            0.7664149 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.909708 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Zur weiteren Rationalisierung der Dokumentationsarbeit wurde mit Hilfe des Datenbankenprogrammes LARS eine Oberfläche entwickelt, die den vielfältigen Anforderungen zur Erschließung von Fachdokumenten entspricht. Mußte bislang in verschiedenen Nachschlagewerken geblättert werden, um beispielsweise die systematische Stellung biologischer Objekte festzustellen, können solche Angaben durch Tastendruck aus einer vorgegebenen Indexdatei übernommen werden. Nicht vorhandene oder durch Wechsel der taxonomischen Bezeichnung veränderte Begriffe können einfach aktualisiert werden. In gleicher Weise werden mit dieser Anwendung chemische und freie Deskriptoren ergänzt und verarbeitet. Weiterhin wurde unter MS-Access eine Datenbankanwendung programmiert, die es ermöglichst, neben den wissenschaftlichen Namen von Insekten, Mikroorganismen, Pflanzen und deren systematische Stellung auch die Trivialnamen in deutsch, englisch, französisch, spanisch und protugiesisch zu recherchieren. Damit ist es möglich, unter Eingabe des Namens einer Krankheit (z.B. 'apple scab') die dazugehörigen Erreger ausfindig zu machen
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Bibliothekswesen und Dokumentation des Landbaus. 1997, H.53, S.42-45
  6. Rügenhagen, M.; Beck, T.S.; Sartorius, E.J.: Information integrity in the era of Fake News : an experiment using library guidelines to judge information integrity (2020) 0.17
    0.16511069 = product of:
      0.33022138 = sum of:
        0.30511117 = weight(_text_:judge in 1114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30511117 = score(doc=1114,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44649598 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            0.68334585 = fieldWeight in 1114, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1114)
        0.025110222 = weight(_text_:und in 1114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025110222 = score(doc=1114,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12808958 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            0.19603643 = fieldWeight in 1114, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1114)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 44(2020) H.1, S.34-53
  7. Dahlberg, I. (Bearb.): Klassifikation und Erkenntnis I : Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 1 "Klassifikation und Wissensgewinnung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979 (1979) 0.16
    0.16039555 = product of:
      0.3207911 = sum of:
        0.26697227 = weight(_text_:judge in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26697227 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44649598 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            0.59792763 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
        0.05381883 = weight(_text_:und in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05381883 = score(doc=749,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.12808958 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            0.42016557 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: SCHEELE, M. Der Mensch als Voraussetzung und als Ziel der Klassifikationsforschung; JUDGE, A.J.N.: Representation of sets: the role of number; DAHLBERG, W.: Zur Geometrie der Grundbegriffe; MERTENS, P.: Die Theorie der Mustererkennung in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften; HANSERT, E.: Statistik als Methodik zur Konstruktion von Wissen; SCHWENDTKE; A.: Wissenschaftssystematik und Scientometrologie; HENRICHS, N.: Gegenstandstheoretische Grundlagen der Bibliotheksklassifikation?; FUGMANN, R. u. J.H. WINTER: Durch mechanisierte Klassifikation zum Analogieschluss; GREITER, F., G. GUTTMANN, E. OESER: Die Rolle der Klassifikation bei der Entwicklung und Bewertung neuer Produkte
  8. Bibliothek leben : Das deutsche Bibliothekswesen als Aufgabe für Wissenschaft und Politik. Eine Festschrift für Engelbert Plassmann zum 70. Geburtstag (2005) 0.15
    0.15120542 = product of:
      0.30241084 = sum of:
        0.051766053 = weight(_text_:und in 2785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051766053 = score(doc=2785,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.12808958 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            0.40413946 = fieldWeight in 2785, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2785)
        0.2506448 = weight(_text_:hering in 2785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2506448 = score(doc=2785,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.572312 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.909708 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            0.43795136 = fieldWeight in 2785, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.909708 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44421)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2785)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Classification
    AN 51000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Bibliographien, Sammelschriften / Fest- und Gedenkschriften für Personen
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Retrospektiven Hans-Michael Schäfer: "Warum baut ein Privatmann eine Bibliothek" - Die Bibliothek Warburg inmitten der preußisch dominierten Bibliothekslandschaft zu Beginn des 20. Jahrhunderts; Horst Röhling: Slavica und Universales im wissenschaftlich-politischen und anthropologischen Kontext der Bibliothek; Dale Askey: Bibliothekstourismus zwischen Deutschland und den Vereinigten Staaten; Hans-Christoph Hobohm: Bibliothek als Zensur; Günter Pflug: Die Ausbildung des höheren Bibliotheksdienstes nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg; Konrad Umlauf: Bibliotheksentwicklungsplanung 1966 bis 1973 und Bibliotheken 2007; Hans Joachim Meyer: Kontinuität und Neubeginn - Sächsische Bibliothekspolitik nach 1990; Siegfried Schmidt: Eine verpaßte Gelegenheit? - Gründe und Hintergründe zur Schließung der Fachhochschule für das öffentliche Bibliothekswesen Bonn; Walther Umstätter: Bibliothekswissenschaft im Spannungsfeld von Bibliotheksgeschichte, Nationalökonomie des Geistes und Informatik; Helmut Jüngling: Themen à la mode -Versuch einer informetrischen Analyse informationswissenschaftlicher Datenbanken; Perspektiven Wolfgang Schmitz: "Gemeinsam können wir viel bewirken" - Die gemeinsamen Fachbibliotheken von USB und Instituten an der Universität zu Köln; Jürgen Hering: Vier Buchstaben und etwas Farbe - Zum Erscheinungsbild der SLUB in der Öffentlichkeit; Ludger Syré: Haben Regionalbibliotheken eine Zukunft? - Zeitgemäße Betrachtungen zu einem scheinbar unzeitgemäßen Bibliothekstyp; Gudrun Behm-Steidel: Spezialbibliotheken in Deutschland - Nische im Bibliothekswesen oder Vorreiter im Informationsmanagement?; Regina Peeters: Auf der Kuhstraße zur Weltliteratur oder: Jedes Lesen ist Übersetzen; Holger Knudsen: Die International Association of Law Libraries (IALL); Torsten Seela: Bibliotheken und Museen als Informationsdienstleister -Konvergenzen und Divergenzen; Christian Uhlig: Buchhandel und Bibliotheken - Konfrontation oder Kooperation?; Reimar Riese: Macht unsere Bücher preiswerter! - Die Preiswürdigkeit von Büchern im Meinungsbild ihrer Konsumenten; Gerhard Hacker: Die Hybridbibliothek - Blackbox oder Ungeheuer?; Jürgen Seefeldt: Die Zukunft der Bibliothek - die Bibliothek der Zukunft: Visionen, Traumschlösser, Realitäten
    RVK
    AN 51000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Bibliographien, Sammelschriften / Fest- und Gedenkschriften für Personen
  9. Fountain, J.F.: Headings for children's materials : an LCSH/Sears companion (1993) 0.11
    0.114416696 = product of:
      0.45766678 = sum of:
        0.45766678 = weight(_text_:judge in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.45766678 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44649598 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            1.0250188 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Public library quarterly 15(1996) no.1, S.65-66 (A.L. Judge)
  10. Auer, S.; Oelen, A.; Haris, A.M.; Stocker, M.; D'Souza, J.; Farfar, K.E.; Vogt, L.; Prinz, M.; Wiens, V.; Jaradeh, M.Y.: Improving access to scientific literature with knowledge graphs : an experiment using library guidelines to judge information integrity (2020) 0.10
    0.103194185 = product of:
      0.20638837 = sum of:
        0.19069448 = weight(_text_:judge in 1317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19069448 = score(doc=1317,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44649598 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            0.42709115 = fieldWeight in 1317, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1317)
        0.01569389 = weight(_text_:und in 1317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01569389 = score(doc=1317,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12808958 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            0.12252277 = fieldWeight in 1317, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1317)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 44(2020) H.3, S.516-529
  11. Tenopir, C.; Jascó, P.: Quality of abstracts (1993) 0.08
    0.07627779 = product of:
      0.30511117 = sum of:
        0.30511117 = weight(_text_:judge in 5025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30511117 = score(doc=5025,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44649598 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            0.68334585 = fieldWeight in 5025, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5025)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Abstracts enable users to judge the relevance of articles, provide a summary and may be a substitute for the original document. Defines abstracts and considers who they are written be according to the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and other sources. Distinguishes between indicative and informative abstracts. Informative abstracts are preferred by ANSI and ERIC. Discusses the content and procedures for abstracting, writing style, tests of quality and readability and informativeness. Presents statistics analyzing abstracts from 3 general interest databases and on abstract length and type
  12. Tenner, R.: ¬An implosion of knowledge? : the quality of information is not keeping up with the quntity (1993) 0.08
    0.07627779 = product of:
      0.30511117 = sum of:
        0.30511117 = weight(_text_:judge in 7870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30511117 = score(doc=7870,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44649598 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            0.68334585 = fieldWeight in 7870, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7870)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the information explosion and poses the question of whether the explosion is driving an equal and opposite information implosion. Uses 4 criteria to judge whether available information has become better or worse: cost, ease or difficulty of access; variety of sources; and clarity. Concludes that none of these have improved over the last generation
  13. Judge, A.J.N.: Envisaging the art of navigating conceptual complexity : in search of software combining artistic and conceptual insights (1995) 0.08
    0.07627779 = product of:
      0.30511117 = sum of:
        0.30511117 = weight(_text_:judge in 1153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30511117 = score(doc=1153,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44649598 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            0.68334585 = fieldWeight in 1153, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1153)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  14. Denning, R.; Shuttleworth, M.; Smith, P.: Interface design concepts in the development of a Web-based information retrieval system (1998) 0.08
    0.07627779 = product of:
      0.30511117 = sum of:
        0.30511117 = weight(_text_:judge in 2004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30511117 = score(doc=2004,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44649598 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            0.68334585 = fieldWeight in 2004, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2004)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Präsentation folgender Gestaltungsprinzipien: (1) Help the user develop an understanding of the operation of the interface and the search process; (2) Provide information to help users judge the value of continuing a search path; (3) Assist the user in refining the search query or search topic; (4) Provide verbal labels suggestive of meaning
  15. Judge, A.J.N.: Strategic correspondences : computer-aided insight scaffolding (1996) 0.08
    0.07627779 = product of:
      0.30511117 = sum of:
        0.30511117 = weight(_text_:judge in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30511117 = score(doc=3816,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44649598 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            0.68334585 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  16. Pal, S.; Mitra, M.; Kamps, J.: Evaluation effort, reliability and reusability in XML retrieval (2011) 0.07
    0.067420684 = product of:
      0.26968274 = sum of:
        0.26968274 = weight(_text_:judge in 197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26968274 = score(doc=197,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.44649598 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            0.6039981 = fieldWeight in 197, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=197)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Initiative for the Evaluation of XML retrieval (INEX) provides a TREC-like platform for evaluating content-oriented XML retrieval systems. Since 2007, INEX has been using a set of precision-recall based metrics for its ad hoc tasks. The authors investigate the reliability and robustness of these focused retrieval measures, and of the INEX pooling method. They explore four specific questions: How reliable are the metrics when assessments are incomplete, or when query sets are small? What is the minimum pool/query-set size that can be used to reliably evaluate systems? Can the INEX collections be used to fairly evaluate "new" systems that did not participate in the pooling process? And, for a fixed amount of assessment effort, would this effort be better spent in thoroughly judging a few queries, or in judging many queries relatively superficially? The authors' findings validate properties of precision-recall-based metrics observed in document retrieval settings. Early precision measures are found to be more error-prone and less stable under incomplete judgments and small topic-set sizes. They also find that system rankings remain largely unaffected even when assessment effort is substantially (but systematically) reduced, and confirm that the INEX collections remain usable when evaluating nonparticipating systems. Finally, they observe that for a fixed amount of effort, judging shallow pools for many queries is better than judging deep pools for a smaller set of queries. However, when judging only a random sample of a pool, it is better to completely judge fewer topics than to partially judge many topics. This result confirms the effectiveness of pooling methods.
  17. Borko, H.; Chatman, S.: Criteria for acceptable abstracts : a survey of abstractors' instructions (1963) 0.07
    0.06674307 = product of:
      0.26697227 = sum of:
        0.26697227 = weight(_text_:judge in 686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26697227 = score(doc=686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44649598 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            0.59792763 = fieldWeight in 686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=686)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The need for criteria by which to judge the adequacy of an abstract is felt most strongly when evaluating machine-produced abstracts. In order to develop a set of criteria, a survey was conducted of the instructions prepared by various scientific publications as a guide to their abstracters in the preparation of copy. One-hundred-and-thirty sets of instructions were analyzed and compared as to their function, content, and form. It was concluded that, while differences in subject matter do not necessarily require different kinds of abstracts, there are significant variations between the informative and the indicative abstract. A set of criteria for the writing of an acceptable abstract of science literature was derived. The adequacy of these criteria is still to be validated, and the athors' plans for fututre research in this area are specified
  18. Janes, J.W.: ¬The binary nature of continous relevance judgements : a study of users' perceptions (1991) 0.07
    0.06674307 = product of:
      0.26697227 = sum of:
        0.26697227 = weight(_text_:judge in 4844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26697227 = score(doc=4844,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44649598 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            0.59792763 = fieldWeight in 4844, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4844)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Replicates a previous study by Eisenberg and Hu regarding users' perceptions of the binary or dichotomous nature of their relevance judgements. The studies examined the assumptions that searchers divide documents evenly into relevant and nonrelevant. 35 staff, faculty and doctoral students at Michigan Univ., School of Education and Dept. of Psychology conducted searchers and the retrieved documents submitted to the searchers in 3 incremental versions: title only; title and abstract; title, abstract and indexing information: At each stage the subjects were asked to judge the relevance of the document to the query. The findings support the earlier study and the break points between relevance and nonrelevance was not at or near 50%
  19. Wilbur, W.J.; Coffee, L.: ¬The effectiveness of document neighboring in search enhancement (1994) 0.07
    0.06674307 = product of:
      0.26697227 = sum of:
        0.26697227 = weight(_text_:judge in 7418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26697227 = score(doc=7418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44649598 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            0.59792763 = fieldWeight in 7418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7418)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Considers two kinds of queries that may be applied to a database. The first is a query written by a searcher to express an information need. The second is a request for documents most similar to a document already judge relevant by the searcher. Examines the effectiveness of these two procedures and shows that in important cases the latter query types is more effective than the former. This provides a new view of the cluster hypothesis and a justification for document neighbouring procedures. If all the documents in a database have readily available precomputed nearest neighbours, a new search algorithm, called parallel neighbourhood searching. Shows that this feedback-based method provides significant improvement in recall over traditional linear searching methods, and appears superior to traditional feedback methods in overall performance
  20. Armstrong, C.J.: Do we really care about quality? (1995) 0.07
    0.06674307 = product of:
      0.26697227 = sum of:
        0.26697227 = weight(_text_:judge in 3946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26697227 = score(doc=3946,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44649598 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.05775266 = queryNorm
            0.59792763 = fieldWeight in 3946, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.731176 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3946)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    With the increased use of local area networks, CD-ROMs and the Internet, an enormous amount of traditional material is becoming available. Quality issues are therefore becoming even more vital. Describes a methodology being evaluated by The Centre for Information Quality (CIQM) whereby databases can be quantitatively labelled by their producers, so that users can judge how much reliance can be place on them. At the same time, each label bacomes a database specific standard to which its information provider must adhere. This may be a route to responsible information supply

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 9349
  • m 2219
  • el 1003
  • x 591
  • s 553
  • i 168
  • r 117
  • ? 66
  • n 55
  • b 47
  • l 23
  • p 22
  • h 17
  • d 15
  • u 14
  • fi 10
  • v 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • ms 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications