Search (373 results, page 1 of 19)

0.07259399 = product of:
  0.29037595 = sum of:
    0.29037595 = weight(_text_:holding in 5849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29037595 = score(doc=5849,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.48681426 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.7124834 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0631203 = queryNorm
        0.596482 = fieldWeight in 5849, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.7124834 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5849)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Typographical errors in bibliographic records can cause retrieval problems in online catalogs. This study examined one hundred typographical errors in records in the OCLC WorldCat database. The local catalogs of five libraries holding the items described by the bibliographic records with typographical errors were searched to determine whether each library had corrected the errors. The study found that only 35.8 percent of the errors had been corrected. Knowledge of copy cataloging error rates can help underscore the importance of quality data in bibliographic utilities and, further, can serve as an indication to libraries whether they need to pay more attention to correcting types in the copy cataloging process.

0.07259399 = product of:
  0.29037595 = sum of:
    0.29037595 = weight(_text_:holding in 3996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29037595 = score(doc=3996,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.48681426 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.7124834 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0631203 = queryNorm
        0.596482 = fieldWeight in 3996, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.7124834 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3996)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Cataloging oral histories presents many difficulties, especially for catalogers who have primarily worked with published materials and for institutions without funds or staff dedicated to managing oral history collections. Methods for cataloging oral histories can vary widely among institutions. In this paper I examine the issues and considerations involved in providing intellectual access to oral history interviews and offer a possible cataloging method to libraries holding unprocessed oral history materials. The cataloging procedures discussed here have worked well from a workflow standpoint as one of the initial steps to create access to oral histories at Columbus State University, a medium-sized academic library.

0.062223416 = product of:
  0.24889366 = sum of:
    0.24889366 = weight(_text_:holding in 3719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24889366 = score(doc=3719,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.48681426 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.7124834 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0631203 = queryNorm
        0.5112703 = fieldWeight in 3719, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.7124834 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3719)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the equivalence relationship as presented by Barbara B. Tillett in her taxonomy of bibliographic relationships. Tillett's definition of equivalence comprised of two parts, first, that equivalence holds between exacts copies of bibliographic items or documents, and second, that it may hold between an original item and a reproduction, if the intellectual content and authorship are presented. It is proposed that this definition is too restrictive, excluding relationships among items that may, based an contexts of use, act as equivalent. Further, it is suggested that a taxonomy of bibliographic relationships be constructed as holding between document representations as opposed to documents themselves. A revised definition of equivalence is offered in which equivalence relationships may hold among document representations in which one or more document properties described in the representations are shared. One advantage of this revision is that it subsumes Tillett's shared characteristic relationship, simplifying the taxonomy.

0.062223416 = product of:
  0.24889366 = sum of:
    0.24889366 = weight(_text_:holding in 1703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24889366 = score(doc=1703,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.48681426 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.7124834 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0631203 = queryNorm
        0.5112703 = fieldWeight in 1703, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.7124834 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1703)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Cataloging principles and objectives guide the formation of cataloging rules governing the organization of information within the library catalog, as well as the function of the catalog itself. Changes in technologies wrought by the internet and the web have been the driving forces behind shifting cataloging practice and reconfigurations of cataloging rules. Modern cataloging principles and objectives started in 1841 with the creation of Panizzi's 91 Rules for the British Museum and gained momentum with Charles Cutter's Rules for Descriptive Cataloging (1904). The first Statement of International Cataloguing Principles (ICP) was adopted in 1961, holding their place through such codifications as AACR and AACR2 in the 1970s and 1980s. Revisions accelerated starting in 2003 with the three original FR models. The Library Reference Model (LRM) in 2017 acted as a catalyst for the evolution of principles and objectives culminating in the creation of Resource Description and Access (RDA) in 2013.

0.05185284 = product of:
  0.20741136 = sum of:
    0.20741136 = weight(_text_:holding in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20741136 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.48681426 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.7124834 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0631203 = queryNorm
        0.42605853 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.7124834 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The Cité des Sciences et de l'Industrie in Paris - the interactive museum for science and technology which opened to the public in 1986 hosts a multimedia library holding some 330,000 documents. The small collection of CD-ROMs integrated into the library's collection since the end of 1991 (''Public section'' and the "Didacthèque") have been expanded in October 1996. Presently more than 800 titles are available for viewing on site or for circulation. After the brief background of CD-ROM installation and collections in French public libraries this paper discusses the problems of describing CD-ROMs in the online catalog. It mostly concentrates on the collection for circulation. The rules of bibliographic description correspond to the draft of the French national standard, which follows the ISBD(ER) principles. The format used for cataloguing in the library is UNIMARC and the automated system - GEAC GLIS. Cataloguing has been done locally since the national bibliographic description of electronic documents was not available at the time when the first collection was constituted. Since April 1997 the "Bibliographie nationale française" on CD-ROM provides the description for electronic documents whose downloading is now possible. This paper analyses the benefits of downloading of bibliographic records for ER and concludes that some local adaptation (updating) is necessary for satisfying end user needs

0.05185284 = product of:
  0.20741136 = sum of:
    0.20741136 = weight(_text_:holding in 2987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20741136 = score(doc=2987,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.48681426 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.7124834 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0631203 = queryNorm
        0.42605853 = fieldWeight in 2987, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.7124834 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2987)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The general purpose of this study is to assess the amount of catalogers' familiarity with Resource Description and Access (RDA) and their readiness for acceptance of these rules and the effect of training on this issue. The methodology of the presented research is a survey study using a descriptive-analytic approach. In this research, the familiarity of 49 catalogers, working for the Cataloging In Publication (CIP) department at the National Library and Archive of Iran with RDA was monitored before and after a training session through a questionnaire. It was specifically prepared for measuring catalogers' familiarity with, and acceptance of, RDA and also highlighting the self-identified and actual levels of this familiarity and acceptance. The results show that before training, catalogers' self-identified familiarity with RDA was higher than the average level. But after the training session, both self-identified and actual familiarity raised dramatically. Furthermore, the significant difference between the research population's features and self-identified, actual familiarity and the rules' acceptance rate among catalogers was examined. In this study, it was confirmed that there is a significant difference between self-stated and actual familiarity of catalogers regarding RDA. According to the results, M.A. catalogers have a self-identified familiarity higher than B.A. catalogers. It was also confirmed that the actual familiarity of catalogers with an M.A. degree before training is higher than catalogers holding a B.A.

0.05185284 = product of:
  0.20741136 = sum of:
    0.20741136 = weight(_text_:holding in 4794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20741136 = score(doc=4794,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.48681426 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.7124834 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0631203 = queryNorm
        0.42605853 = fieldWeight in 4794, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.7124834 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4794)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This paper presents the first large-scale investigation of the users and uses of WorldCat.org, the world's largest bibliographic database and global union catalog. Using a mixed-methods approach involving focus group interviews with 120 participants, an online survey with 2,918 responses, and an analysis of transaction logs of approximately 15 million sessions from WorldCat.org, the study provides a new understanding of the context for global union catalog use. We find that WorldCat.org is accessed by a diverse population, with the three primary user groups being librarians, students, and academics. Use of the system is found to fall within three broad types of work-task (professional, academic, and leisure), and we also present an emergent taxonomy of search tasks that encompass known-item, unknown-item, and institutional information searches. Our results support the notion that union catalogs are primarily used for known-item searches, although the volume of traffic to WorldCat.org means that unknown-item searches nonetheless represent an estimated 250,000 sessions per month. Search engine referrals account for almost half of all traffic, but although WorldCat.org effectively connects users referred from institutional library catalogs to other libraries holding a sought item, users arriving from a search engine are less likely to connect to a library.

0.020796312 = product of:
  0.08318525 = sum of:
    0.08318525 = weight(_text_:und in 6246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08318525 = score(doc=6246,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13999446 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0631203 = queryNorm
        0.5942039 = fieldWeight in 6246, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6246)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Vorstellung eines Erfassungsschemas zur formalen und inhaltlichen Erschließung von Leichenpredigten am Beispiel der Leichenpredigtensammlung der Magdeburger Universitätsbibliothek.

Source

Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 3(1979) H.2, S.112-121

0.02058301 = product of:
  0.08233204 = sum of:
    0.08233204 = weight(_text_:und in 6903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08233204 = score(doc=6903,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13999446 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0631203 = queryNorm
        0.58810925 = fieldWeight in 6903, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6903)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Altes Buch und Neue Medien: Vorträge und Kommissionssitzungen. Der österreichische Bibliothekartag 1992, Eisenstadt, 29.9.-3.10.1992. Hrsg.: Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare

0.02058301 = product of:
  0.08233204 = sum of:
    0.08233204 = weight(_text_:und in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08233204 = score(doc=2651,freq=32.0), product of:
        0.13999446 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0631203 = queryNorm
        0.58810925 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
          5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
            32.0 = termFreq=32.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Der neue Erschliessungsstandard RDA beschäftigt aktuell unzählige Arbeitsgruppen und Einzelpersonen aus verschiedenen Ländern. Dabei geht es vor allem um die Anpassung einzelner Regeln und Konzepte an lokale Gegebenheiten und spezifische Medientypen. Das erklärte Ziel, den Standard auch für nicht-bibliothekarische Communities attraktiv zu machen, stand jedoch bislang im Hintergrund. Es ist unklar, ob und wie sich RDA beispielsweise in Archiven und Sondersammlungen anwenden lässt. Diese Bachelorarbeit widmet sich dieser Unsicherheit und untersucht die Möglichkeiten der Katalogisierung von ausgewählten archivalischen Ressourcen. Mittels einer Literaturanalyse werden die von Nutzern und Erschliessenden als essenziell erachteten Merkmale von Briefen und Fotografien erhoben und auf die Beschreibungsmöglichkeiten mit RDA hin untersucht. Dabei zeigt sich, dass der Standard grundsätzlich aufgeschlossen gegenüber archivalischen und historischen Ressourcen ist und sich lediglich vereinzelte Anpassungen von Begriffslisten und An- wendungsregeln empfehlen. Entscheidende Fragestellungen, wie die Abbildung von Kontextualität und Hierarchien, müssen jedoch noch geklärt werden, um die Attraktivität des Standards für nicht-bibliothekarische Communities weiter zu verbessern.

Imprint

Chur : Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft

0.01940585 = product of:
  0.0776234 = sum of:
    0.0776234 = weight(_text_:und in 5958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0776234 = score(doc=5958,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13999446 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0631203 = queryNorm
        0.5544748 = fieldWeight in 5958, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5958)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 23(1976), S.141-150

0.01940585 = product of:
  0.0776234 = sum of:
    0.0776234 = weight(_text_:und in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0776234 = score(doc=5973,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13999446 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0631203 = queryNorm
        0.5544748 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 37(1990), S.21-30

0.01940585 = product of:
  0.0776234 = sum of:
    0.0776234 = weight(_text_:und in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0776234 = score(doc=166,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13999446 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0631203 = queryNorm
        0.5544748 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 47(1994) H.3/4, S.58-60

0.01940585 = product of:
  0.0776234 = sum of:
    0.0776234 = weight(_text_:und in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0776234 = score(doc=2758,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.13999446 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0631203 = queryNorm
        0.5544748 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Die Zusammenarbeit von Archiven und Bibliotheken bei der Erschließung von Autographen und Nachlässen hat sich durch den Einsatz elektronischer Medien in den letzten zwanzig Jahren erheblich gewandelt. Inzwischen gibt es online abrufbare Datenbanken über Handschriften- und Nachlassbestände beim Bundesarchiv Koblenz und der Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin. Die Aufgabe der Zukunft wird es sein, die in Deutschland traditionelle Trennung von Archiven und Bibliotheken in diesem wichtigen Bereich endgültig zu überwinden.

Source

Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 30(2006) H.3, S.283-289

0.017825412 = product of:
  0.07130165 = sum of:
    0.07130165 = weight(_text_:und in 5971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07130165 = score(doc=5971,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13999446 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0631203 = queryNorm
        0.50931764 = fieldWeight in 5971, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5971)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Bibliotheken mit und ohne Grenzen: Informationsgesellschaft und Bibliothek. Der österreichische Bibliothekartag 1990, Bregenz, 4.-8.9.1990, Vorträge und Kommissionssitzungen

0.017825412 = product of:
  0.07130165 = sum of:
    0.07130165 = weight(_text_:und in 7777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07130165 = score(doc=7777,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13999446 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0631203 = queryNorm
        0.50931764 = fieldWeight in 7777, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7777)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Der Österreichische Bibliothekartag 1988, Linz, 5.-10. September 1988, Vorträge und Kommissionssitzungen, Pre-Conference Seminar. Hrsg.: Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare

0.017825412 = product of:
  0.07130165 = sum of:
    0.07130165 = weight(_text_:und in 7780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07130165 = score(doc=7780,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13999446 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0631203 = queryNorm
        0.50931764 = fieldWeight in 7780, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7780)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Series

Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie: Sonderh.48

Source

Reden und Vorträge: 4. Deutscher Bibliothekskongreß, 78. Deutscher Bibliothekartag in Berlin 1988. Hrsg.: B. Dankert u.a

0.017825412 = product of:
  0.07130165 = sum of:
    0.07130165 = weight(_text_:und in 7781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07130165 = score(doc=7781,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13999446 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0631203 = queryNorm
        0.50931764 = fieldWeight in 7781, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7781)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Der Österreichische Bibliothekartag 1988, Linz, 5.-10. September 1988, Vorträge und Kommissionssitzungen, Pre-Conference Seminar. Hrsg.: Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare

0.017825412 = product of:
  0.07130165 = sum of:
    0.07130165 = weight(_text_:und in 3490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07130165 = score(doc=3490,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13999446 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0631203 = queryNorm
        0.50931764 = fieldWeight in 3490, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3490)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Series

Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie: Sonderh.63

Source

85. Deutscher Bibliothekartag in Göttingen 1995: Die Herausforderung der Bibliotheken durch elektronische Medien und neue Organisationsformen. Hrsg.: S. Wefers

0.017825412 = product of:
  0.07130165 = sum of:
    0.07130165 = weight(_text_:und in 3491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07130165 = score(doc=3491,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13999446 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0631203 = queryNorm
        0.50931764 = fieldWeight in 3491, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3491)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Series

Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie: Sonderh.63

Source

85. Deutscher Bibliothekartag in Göttingen 1995: Die Herausforderung der Bibliotheken durch elektronische Medien und neue Organisationsformen. Hrsg.: S. Wefers