Search (1173 results, page 1 of 59)

0.27553567 = product of:
  1.1021427 = sum of:
    1.1021427 = weight(_text_:judaica in 2877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      1.1021427 = score(doc=2877,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.51200384 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059463248 = queryNorm
        2.1526062 = fieldWeight in 2877, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2877)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Judaica librarianship. 2(1985), S.20-25

0.2530957 = product of:
  1.0123827 = sum of:
    1.0123827 = weight(_text_:judaica in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      1.0123827 = score(doc=4907,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.51200384 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059463248 = queryNorm
        1.9772952 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Notes the additions and changes made to the LCC in those parts of the schedules of major importance to judaica libraries

Source

Judaica librarianship. 5(1990/91) no.2, S.223-226

0.2530957 = product of:
  1.0123827 = sum of:
    1.0123827 = weight(_text_:judaica in 7212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      1.0123827 = score(doc=7212,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.51200384 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059463248 = queryNorm
        1.9772952 = fieldWeight in 7212, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7212)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reports recent changes to the Library of Congress Classification of interest to Judaica librarians and extracted from issues of the LoC Additions and Changes

Source

Judaica librarianship. 7(1992/93) nos.1/2, S.79-86

0.24109371 = product of:
  0.96437484 = sum of:
    0.96437484 = weight(_text_:judaica in 5504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.96437484 = score(doc=5504,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.51200384 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059463248 = queryNorm
        1.8835305 = fieldWeight in 5504, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5504)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Judaica librarianship. 10(1999/01) nos.1/2, S.31-40

0.21091306 = product of:
  0.84365225 = sum of:
    0.84365225 = weight(_text_:judaica in 1076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.84365225 = score(doc=1076,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.51200384 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059463248 = queryNorm
        1.647746 = fieldWeight in 1076, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1076)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reports the additions and changes made to the LCC between Apr 93 and Dec 94 in the classes of major importance to Judaica libraries. Most changes have taken place in class BM (Judaism), BS (Bible), DS (History of Asia), and PJ (Oriental Language and literature)

Source

Judaica librarianship. 9(1994/94) nos.1/2, S.95-108

0.20665176 = product of:
  0.82660705 = sum of:
    0.82660705 = weight(_text_:judaica in 4446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.82660705 = score(doc=4446,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.51200384 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059463248 = queryNorm
        1.6144547 = fieldWeight in 4446, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4446)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Judaica librarianship. 6(1991/92) nos.1/2, S.76-80

0.19483314 = product of:
  0.7793326 = sum of:
    0.7793326 = weight(_text_:judaica in 2873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.7793326 = score(doc=2873,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51200384 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059463248 = queryNorm
        1.5221225 = fieldWeight in 2873, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2873)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.17326832 = product of:
  0.34653664 = sum of:
    0.03918284 = weight(_text_:und in 4067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03918284 = score(doc=4067,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13188349 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059463248 = queryNorm
        0.29710194 = fieldWeight in 4067, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4067)
    0.3073538 = weight(_text_:herrmann in 4067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3073538 = score(doc=4067,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4861184 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.175107 = idf(docFreq=33, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059463248 = queryNorm
        0.63226116 = fieldWeight in 4067, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.175107 = idf(docFreq=33, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4067)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Die moderne Gesellschaft leidet an Reizüberflutung durch Fernsehen, Internet, Zeitschriften aller Art. Jack Meadows, Professor für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft setzt sich mit Definitionen zu Begriffen wie 'Data', 'Information', 'Communication' oder 'Knowledge' auseinander, die für uns alläglich geworden sind. wie verarbeiten wir den Fluss von wichtigen und unwichtigen Informationen, der täglich auf uns einströmt? Welche 'Daten' sind es für uns Wert, gespeichert zu werden, welche vergessen wir nach kurzer Zeit? Wann wird aus Information Wissen oder gar Weisheit? Das Buch ist eine grundlegende Einführung in das weitläufige Thema Information und Wissensmanagement

Footnote

Rez. in: BuB 54(2002) H.6, S.424 (J. Herrmann)

0.17220978 = product of:
  0.68883914 = sum of:
    0.68883914 = weight(_text_:judaica in 7205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.68883914 = score(doc=7205,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.51200384 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059463248 = queryNorm
        1.3453789 = fieldWeight in 7205, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7205)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Presents a list of subject headings of interest to Judaica and Hebraica librarians and extracted from the Library of Congress weekly lists numbers 30-51 (1991) and 1-20 (1992) and reporting changes that have been made to LCSH as they pertain to Jewish materials

Source

Judaica librarianship. 7(1992/93), nos.1/2, S.72-78

0.17220978 = product of:
  0.68883914 = sum of:
    0.68883914 = weight(_text_:judaica in 3186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.68883914 = score(doc=3186,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.51200384 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059463248 = queryNorm
        1.3453789 = fieldWeight in 3186, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3186)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reports the additions and changes to LCSH of interest to Judaica and Hebraica librarians, made between May 92 and Feb 94 and reported in the LoC Weekly Lists

Source

Judaica librarianship. 8(1993/94), nos.1/2, S.73-82

0.17220978 = product of:
  0.68883914 = sum of:
    0.68883914 = weight(_text_:judaica in 5842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.68883914 = score(doc=5842,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.51200384 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059463248 = queryNorm
        1.3453789 = fieldWeight in 5842, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5842)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reports the additions and changes to LCSH of interest to Judaica and Hebraica librarians, made between Feb 94 and Sep 95 and reported in the LoC Weekly Lists

Source

Judaica librarianship. 9(1994/95), nos.1/2, S.86-94

0.17220978 = product of:
  0.68883914 = sum of:
    0.68883914 = weight(_text_:judaica in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.68883914 = score(doc=620,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.51200384 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059463248 = queryNorm
        1.3453789 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to discuss the second edition of the Encyclopaedia Judaica (2007) within its broader historical context of the production of encyclopedias in the twentieth and the twenty-first centuries. The paper contrasts the 2007 edition of the Encyclopaedia Judaica to the Jewish Encyclopedia published between 1901 and 1905, and to the first edition of the Encyclopaedia Judaica published in 1972; then contrasts the 2007 edition of the Encyclopaedia Judaica to Wikipedia and to other projects of online encyclopedias. Design/methodology/approach - The paper provides a personal reflective review of the sources in question. Findings - That Encyclopaedia Judaica in its latest edition does not adequately replace the original first edition in terms of depth of scholarly work. It is considered that the model offered by Wikipedia could work well for the Encyclopaedia Judaica, allowing it to retain the core of the expert knowledge, and at the same time channel the energy of volunteer editors which has made Wikipedia such a success. Practical implications - The paper is of interest to those with an interest in encyclopedia design or Jewish studies. Originality/value - This paper provides a unique reflection on the latest edition of the encyclopedia and considers future models for its publication based on traditional and non-traditional methods.

Object

Encyclopedia Judaica

0.170479 = product of:
  0.681916 = sum of:
    0.681916 = weight(_text_:judaica in 3190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.681916 = score(doc=3190,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.51200384 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059463248 = queryNorm
        1.3318572 = fieldWeight in 3190, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3190)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reports the additions and changes made to the LCC between Jul 92 and Mar 93 in the classes of major importance to Judaica libraries. Records the usual Cutter additioins and changes to various topics under class BM (Judaism) and its tables, BS (Bible), DS (History), PJ (Language and literature) and other classes that have had changes pertaining to Judaica during this period. Notes several Cutter additions under class DS 135 (History of Jews outside of Palestine, by region or country A-Z) that reflect the recent demise of the Soviet Union and the former republics that have become independent states

Source

Judaica librarianship. 8(1993/94) no.2, S.68-72

0.170479 = product of:
  0.681916 = sum of:
    0.681916 = weight(_text_:judaica in 5846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.681916 = score(doc=5846,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51200384 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059463248 = queryNorm
        1.3318572 = fieldWeight in 5846, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5846)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Judaica librarianship. 10(1999/01) nos.1/2, S.14-17

0.14612485 = product of:
  0.5844994 = sum of:
    0.5844994 = weight(_text_:judaica in 4444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5844994 = score(doc=4444,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51200384 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059463248 = queryNorm
        1.1415919 = fieldWeight in 4444, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4444)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Judaica librarianship. 6(1991/92) nos.1/2, S.81-93

0.14612485 = product of:
  0.5844994 = sum of:
    0.5844994 = weight(_text_:judaica in 4904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5844994 = score(doc=4904,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51200384 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059463248 = queryNorm
        1.1415919 = fieldWeight in 4904, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4904)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Judaica librarianship. 5(1990/91) no.2, S.161-163

0.14612485 = product of:
  0.5844994 = sum of:
    0.5844994 = weight(_text_:judaica in 6400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5844994 = score(doc=6400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51200384 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059463248 = queryNorm
        1.1415919 = fieldWeight in 6400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6400)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.09741657 = product of:
  0.3896663 = sum of:
    0.3896663 = weight(_text_:judaica in 4014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3896663 = score(doc=4014,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51200384 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059463248 = queryNorm
        0.76106125 = fieldWeight in 4014, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4014)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Judaica librarianship. 6(1991/92) nos.1/2, S.24-32,37

0.07306243 = product of:
  0.2922497 = sum of:
    0.2922497 = weight(_text_:judaica in 6161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2922497 = score(doc=6161,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51200384 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059463248 = queryNorm
        0.57079595 = fieldWeight in 6161, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6161)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.046571136 = product of:
  0.18628454 = sum of:
    0.18628454 = weight(_text_:herrmann in 2978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18628454 = score(doc=2978,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.4861184 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.175107 = idf(docFreq=33, maxDocs=44421)
          0.059463248 = queryNorm
        0.38320816 = fieldWeight in 2978, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.175107 = idf(docFreq=33, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2978)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This chapter examines the nature of semantic relations and their main applications in information science. The nature and types of semantic relations are discussed from the perspectives of linguistics and psychology. An overview of the semantic relations used in knowledge structures such as thesauri and ontologies is provided, as well as the main techniques used in the automatic extraction of semantic relations from text. The chapter then reviews the use of semantic relations in information extraction, information retrieval, question-answering, and automatic text summarization applications. Concepts and relations are the foundation of knowledge and thought. When we look at the world, we perceive not a mass of colors but objects to which we automatically assign category labels. Our perceptual system automatically segments the world into concepts and categories. Concepts are the building blocks of knowledge; relations act as the cement that links concepts into knowledge structures. We spend much of our lives identifying regular associations and relations between objects, events, and processes so that the world has an understandable structure and predictability. Our lives and work depend on the accuracy and richness of this knowledge structure and its web of relations. Relations are needed for reasoning and inferencing. Chaffin and Herrmann (1988b, p. 290) noted that "relations between ideas have long been viewed as basic to thought, language, comprehension, and memory." Aristotle's Metaphysics (Aristotle, 1961; McKeon, expounded on several types of relations. The majority of the 30 entries in a section of the Metaphysics known today as the Philosophical Lexicon referred to relations and attributes, including cause, part-whole, same and opposite, quality (i.e., attribute) and kind-of, and defined different types of each relation. Hume (1955) pointed out that there is a connection between successive ideas in our minds, even in our dreams, and that the introduction of an idea in our mind automatically recalls an associated idea. He argued that all the objects of human reasoning are divided into relations of ideas and matters of fact and that factual reasoning is founded on the cause-effect relation. His Treatise of Human Nature identified seven kinds of relations: resemblance, identity, relations of time and place, proportion in quantity or number, degrees in quality, contrariety, and causation. Mill (1974, pp. 989-1004) discoursed on several types of relations, claiming that all things are either feelings, substances, or attributes, and that attributes can be a quality (which belongs to one object) or a relation to other objects.
Linguists in the structuralist tradition (e.g., Lyons, 1977; Saussure, 1959) have asserted that concepts cannot be defined on their own but only in relation to other concepts. Semantic relations appear to reflect a logical structure in the fundamental nature of thought (Caplan & Herrmann, 1993). Green, Bean, and Myaeng (2002) noted that semantic relations play a critical role in how we represent knowledge psychologically, linguistically, and computationally, and that many systems of knowledge representation start with a basic distinction between entities and relations. Green (2001, p. 3) said that "relationships are involved as we combine simple entities to form more complex entities, as we compare entities, as we group entities, as one entity performs a process on another entity, and so forth. Indeed, many things that we might initially regard as basic and elemental are revealed upon further examination to involve internal structure, or in other words, internal relationships." Concepts and relations are often expressed in language and text. Language is used not just for communicating concepts and relations, but also for representing, storing, and reasoning with concepts and relations. We shall examine the nature of semantic relations from a linguistic and psychological perspective, with an emphasis on relations expressed in text. The usefulness of semantic relations in information science, especially in ontology construction, information extraction, information retrieval, question-answering, and text summarization is discussed. Research and development in information science have focused on concepts and terms, but the focus will increasingly shift to the identification, processing, and management of relations to achieve greater effectiveness and refinement in information science techniques. Previous chapters in ARIST on natural language processing (Chowdhury, 2003), text mining (Trybula, 1999), information retrieval and the philosophy of language (Blair, 2003), and query expansion (Efthimiadis, 1996) provide a background for this discussion, as semantic relations are an important part of these applications.