Search (1208 results, page 1 of 61)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Cowell, J.: Essential Java fast : how to write object oriented software for the Internet in Java (1997) 0.23
    0.22538109 = product of:
      0.90152436 = sum of:
        0.90152436 = weight(_text_:java in 6858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.90152436 = score(doc=6858,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.4587406 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            1.965216 = fieldWeight in 6858, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6858)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Why use Java? Object oriented primer. Java applets. The Java language. Branching and looping. Graphics. Animation and multithreading. Handling exceptions. The Java.awt package. Handling events. Windows, dialogs and menus. Input and output streams. Modifiers and packages. Java and C++
    LCSH
    Java (Computer program language)
    Object
    Java
    RSWK
    Java <Programmiersprache>
    World wide web / Seite / Gestaltung / Java <Programmiersprache> (2134) (4231)
    Subject
    Java (Computer program language)
    Java <Programmiersprache>
    World wide web / Seite / Gestaltung / Java <Programmiersprache> (2134) (4231)
  2. Cavanaugh, B.B.: ¬The Ovid Java client interface : a comparison with the Ovid Web Gateway and Windows Client interface (1998) 0.17
    0.17499004 = product of:
      0.6999602 = sum of:
        0.6999602 = weight(_text_:java in 5740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.6999602 = score(doc=5740,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.4587406 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            1.52583 = fieldWeight in 5740, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5740)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Ovid Java interface is compared with the Ovid Web Gateway and Ovid Windows Client, focusing on functionality from the user's perspective. The Java version draws upon both earlier Web and Windows versions, thus combining the worlds of the Web and application programs. It is concluded that Ovid Java offers enhanced functionality and requires high-end hardware and browser software to run well. Additional enhancements are forthcoming, some dependent upon the further development of Sun Microsystems' Java programming language
    Object
    Java
  3. Kölle, R.; Langemeier, G.; Womser-Hacker, C.: Kollaboratives Lernen in virtuellen Teams am Beispiel der Java-Programmierung (2008) 0.16
    0.15777843 = product of:
      0.31555685 = sum of:
        0.25003785 = weight(_text_:java in 2393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25003785 = score(doc=2393,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4587406 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            0.5450528 = fieldWeight in 2393, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2393)
        0.065519 = weight(_text_:und in 2393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065519 = score(doc=2393,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.14436881 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            0.4538307 = fieldWeight in 2393, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2393)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Komplexe Aufgaben und Probleme werden heute üblicherweise im Team bearbeitet und gelöst. Das gilt insbesondere für Softwareprojekte, denn die Entwicklung komplexer Softwaresysteme findet heutzutage meistens arbeitsteilig in - zunehmend räumlich verteilten - Teams statt. Vor diesem Hintergrund wird zum einen ein rollenbasiertes Konzept vorgestellt, das virtuellen Lernteams bei der Zusammenarbeit einen virtuellen Tutor zur Seite stellt, der dem Team im Rahmen von Rollendefiziten adaptierte Hilfestellung bietet und so die Lerneffektivität unterstützt. Zum anderen wird gezeigt, wie das Zusammenspiel zweier spezialisierter Systeme (VitaminL und K3) im Kontext des Blended Learning echte Mehrwerte in E-Learning-Szenarien bringen kann. Die in Benutzertests und einer Lehrveranstaltung ermittelten Evaluierungsergebnisse lassen auf die Tragfähigkeit des rollenbasierten, tutoriellen Konzepts schließen und decken gleichzeitig großes Weiterentwicklungpotenzial auf.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 59(2008) H.1, S.37-40
  4. Hickey, T.B.: ¬A Java Z39.50 Client for Browsing Large Databases (2001) 0.15
    0.15154582 = product of:
      0.6061833 = sum of:
        0.6061833 = weight(_text_:java in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.6061833 = score(doc=2051,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.4587406 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            1.3214076 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Object
    Java
  5. Schröter, H.G.: Computer-Industrie wirft das Netz der Netze über die Kundschaft aus (1996) 0.15
    0.14978278 = product of:
      0.29956555 = sum of:
        0.25003785 = weight(_text_:java in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25003785 = score(doc=3593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4587406 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            0.5450528 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
        0.049527705 = weight(_text_:und in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049527705 = score(doc=3593,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.14436881 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            0.34306374 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Internet verändert die Software-Szene / Java macht Dampf / PC bekommt Konkurrenz / Aufgeweckte Riesen gegen innovative Zwerge / Intranet heißt der neue Renner
    Content
    Das Internet boomt. Rund um den Globus basteln etablierte EDV-Konzerne und Branchenneulinge an Hard- und Software für das Netz der Netze. Glaubt man den Auguren, läutet seine Beliebtheit eine Revolution in der Informationstechnik ein. Der Ära der Großrechner und der Personalcomputer soll ein Zeitalter folgen, in dem 'das Netz der Computer' ist. Wer dann die Fäden ziehen wird, ist längst nicht ausgemacht. Ob herkömmliche PC mit ihren Programmen die Spinne im Netz bleiben oder neue Geräte und Software sich breitmachen, darüber wird derzeit lebhaft diskutiert
  6. hel: Bayerische Staatsbibliothek paktiert mit Google (2007) 0.14
    0.14477818 = product of:
      0.28955635 = sum of:
        0.065519 = weight(_text_:und in 711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065519 = score(doc=711,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.14436881 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            0.4538307 = fieldWeight in 711, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=711)
        0.22403736 = weight(_text_:hingegen in 711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22403736 = score(doc=711,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43423468 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6710296 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            0.51593614 = fieldWeight in 711, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6710296 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=711)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Die Bayerische Staatsbibliothek hat eine Kooperation mit Google vereinbart. Der Internet-Gigant soll sämtliche Buchbestände digitalisieren, die nicht dem Urheberschutz unterliegen und in »Google Book Search« integrieren.
    Content
    "Hunderttausende Texte werden online gestellt, heißt es in der Pressemitteilung, »von Klassikern wie den Gebrüdern Grimm und Goethe bis hin zu umfangreichen Spezialsammlungen und Raritäten«. Der Pakt ist in der Bibliotheksszene umstritten. Kritiker befürchten eine ungenügende Erschließung und warnen vor dem digitalen Angebotsmonopol. Der Generaldirektor der Staatsbibliothek, Rolf Griebel, prophezeit hingegen, die »wahre Bestimmung der Bibliotheken - nämlich die Entdeckung von Büchern und Wissen« werde vorangebracht. An Googles Bibliotheksprojekt nehmen bereits teil: die Universitätsbibliotheken von Michigan, Harvard, Oxford, Complutense Madrid, Stanford, Virginia, Wisconsin, Princeton und Kalifornien sowie die Bibliothek von Barcelona und die New York Public Library."
  7. Fisher, Y.: Better CGI scripts (i.V.) 0.14
    0.14287879 = product of:
      0.57151514 = sum of:
        0.57151514 = weight(_text_:java in 6015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.57151514 = score(doc=6015,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4587406 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            1.2458351 = fieldWeight in 6015, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6015)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Object
    JAVA
  8. Blake, P.; Nelson, M.: Ovid unveils Java search client (1996) 0.14
    0.14287879 = product of:
      0.57151514 = sum of:
        0.57151514 = weight(_text_:java in 45) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.57151514 = score(doc=45,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.4587406 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            1.2458351 = fieldWeight in 45, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=45)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Ovid Technologies is launching its Java search client to enable users to access Ovid's scientific databases on the Web with full search capabilities irrespective of the type of computer used. Explains the differences between Java and HTML. The Java client increases search speed by several orders of magnitude. The Ovid client does not need to wait for individual pages to load and incorporates multi-tasking. The interface includes tree displays; thesauri; mapping; explode/implode; search fields and context sensitive help. Display; save; and e-mail are available from the client
  9. Bandholtz, T.; Schulte-Coerne, T.; Glaser, R.; Fock, J.; Keller, T.: iQvoc - open source SKOS(XL) maintenance and publishing tool (2010) 0.14
    0.13740085 = product of:
      0.2748017 = sum of:
        0.25003785 = weight(_text_:java in 1604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25003785 = score(doc=1604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4587406 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            0.5450528 = fieldWeight in 1604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1604)
        0.024763852 = weight(_text_:und in 1604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024763852 = score(doc=1604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14436881 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            0.17153187 = fieldWeight in 1604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1604)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    iQvoc is a new open source SKOS-XL vocabulary management tool developed by the Federal Environment Agency, Germany, and innoQ Deutschland GmbH. Its immediate purpose is maintaining and publishing reference vocabularies in the upcoming Linked Data cloud of environmental information, but it may be easily adapted to host any SKOS- XL compliant vocabulary. iQvoc is implemented as a Ruby on Rails application running on top of JRuby - the Java implementation of the Ruby Programming Language. To increase the user experience when editing content, iQvoc uses heavily the JavaScript library jQuery.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  10. Mesaric, G.: Black magic Web : using the new World Wide Web technologies (1997) 0.13
    0.12501892 = product of:
      0.5000757 = sum of:
        0.5000757 = weight(_text_:java in 5463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5000757 = score(doc=5463,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.4587406 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            1.0901057 = fieldWeight in 5463, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5463)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A spell book for mastering the WWW. Step by step, readers are taught how to use the Internet efficiently, and, in particular, how to publish information on the Web. After completing this book, the reader will be able, for example, to create stunning Web home pages and even take the first steps in Java programming. There are many books on the net bound to either one product, e.g. Mosaic, or to one topic, HTML. Mesaric, on the other hand, covers all WWW-related topics and all products which are in popular use. The magic revealed includes common data formats (HTML, PDF, JPEG, GIF), an introduction to Java and Java Srcipt, emerging technologies such as Hyper-G, hypermedia authoring with Haemony and Amadeus, information about ATM, TeleScript, and much more
    Object
    JAVA
  11. Read, T.; Hall, H.: Java: an explosion on the Internet (1996) 0.13
    0.12501892 = product of:
      0.5000757 = sum of:
        0.5000757 = weight(_text_:java in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5000757 = score(doc=86,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4587406 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            1.0901057 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  12. Jascó, P.: Publishing textual databases on the Web : part 3 of this series examines Java applets and CGI/DLL programs (1998) 0.12
    0.11980749 = product of:
      0.47922996 = sum of:
        0.47922996 = weight(_text_:java in 6217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.47922996 = score(doc=6217,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.4587406 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            1.0446644 = fieldWeight in 6217, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6217)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A detailed description of how to use Java applets and Common Gateway Interface (CGI)/Dynamic Link Library (DLL) programs for Web publication of textual databases. The advantages of Java applets include low cost, flexible and visually appealing search interfaces, and the ability to be embedded in HTML pages, eliminating the need for Internet service provider permissions for their use. Highlights the FindIt family of Java applets from DoubleOLogic as one of the best product lines in the category. CGI programs may be written in Perl, Java, or some other language, and like DLL programs, must be installed on the server side. Notes that small-scale CGI and DLL applications cost from $150 to $8,000. Highlights Insight from Enigma Inc. as an excellent program at the high end of the cost range
  13. Fisher, Y.: Spinning the Web : a guide to serving information on the World Wide Web (1996) 0.11
    0.10826957 = product of:
      0.4330783 = sum of:
        0.4330783 = weight(_text_:java in 6014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4330783 = score(doc=6014,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.4587406 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            0.94405925 = fieldWeight in 6014, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6014)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Most books on the Internet describe it from the user's end. This one, however, is unique in its focus on serving information on the WWW. It presents everything from the basics to advanced techniques and will thus prove invaluable to site administrators and developers. The author - an expert developer and researcher at UCSD - covers such topics as HTML 3.0, serving documents, interfaces, WWW utilities and browsers such as Netscape. Fisher also includes an introduction to programming with JAVA and JAVA sript, as well as the complete VRML 1.0 specification
    Object
    JAVA
  14. Varela, C.A.; Agha, G.A.: What after Java? : From objects to actors (1998) 0.11
    0.10826957 = product of:
      0.4330783 = sum of:
        0.4330783 = weight(_text_:java in 4612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4330783 = score(doc=4612,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.4587406 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            0.94405925 = fieldWeight in 4612, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4612)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses drawbacks of the Java programming language, and proposes some potential improvements for concurrent object-oriented software development. Java's passive object model does not provide an effective means for building distributed applications, critical for the future of Web-based next-generation information systems. Suggests improvements to Java's existing mechanisms for maintaining consistency across multiple threads, sending asynchronous messages and controlling resources. Drives the discussion with examples and suggestions from work on the Actor model of computation
    Object
    Java
  15. Cranefield, S.: Networked knowledge representation and exchange using UML and RDF (2001) 0.11
    0.10826957 = product of:
      0.4330783 = sum of:
        0.4330783 = weight(_text_:java in 6896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4330783 = score(doc=6896,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.4587406 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            0.94405925 = fieldWeight in 6896, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6896)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper proposes the use of the Unified Modeling Language (UML) as a language for modelling ontologies for Web resources and the knowledge contained within them. To provide a mechanism for serialising and processing object diagrams representing knowledge, a pair of XSI-T stylesheets have been developed to map from XML Metadata Interchange (XMI) encodings of class diagrams to corresponding RDF schemas and to Java classes representing the concepts in the ontologies. The Java code includes methods for marshalling and unmarshalling object-oriented information between in-memory data structures and RDF serialisations of that information. This provides a convenient mechanism for Java applications to share knowledge on the Web
  16. Hickey, T.B.: Guidon Web Applying Java to Scholarly Electronic Journals (2001) 0.11
    0.107159086 = product of:
      0.42863634 = sum of:
        0.42863634 = weight(_text_:java in 2035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.42863634 = score(doc=2035,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4587406 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            0.9343763 = fieldWeight in 2035, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2035)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  17. Shafer, K.E.; Surface, T.R.: Java Server Side Interpreter and OCLC SiteSearch (2001) 0.11
    0.107159086 = product of:
      0.42863634 = sum of:
        0.42863634 = weight(_text_:java in 2050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.42863634 = score(doc=2050,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4587406 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            0.9343763 = fieldWeight in 2050, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2050)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  18. Ovid announces strategic partnerships : Java-based interface (1997) 0.10
    0.10103055 = product of:
      0.4041222 = sum of:
        0.4041222 = weight(_text_:java in 397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4041222 = score(doc=397,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.4587406 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            0.8809384 = fieldWeight in 397, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=397)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports agreements between Ovid Technologies and 5 publishing companies (Blackwell Science, Lippincott-Raven, Munksgaard, Plenum, Willams and Wilkins) to secure the rights to the full text over 400 leading periodicals. Once the periodicals are loaded on Ovid they will be linked with other fulltext electronic periodicals to bibliographic databases to produce a web of related documents and threaded information. Concludes with notes on the Ovid Java Client graphic user interface, which offers increased speeds of searching the WWW
  19. Rösch, H.: Entwicklungsstand und Qualitätsmanagement digitaler Auskunft in Bibliotheken (2007) 0.09
    0.094028994 = product of:
      0.18805799 = sum of:
        0.060036644 = weight(_text_:und in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060036644 = score(doc=1400,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.14436881 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            0.41585606 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
        0.12802134 = weight(_text_:hingegen in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12802134 = score(doc=1400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43423468 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.6710296 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            0.29482064 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.6710296 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44421)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Zunächst wird die aktuelle Bedeutung digitaler Auskunft in der Informationsgesellschaft angesprochen. Anschließend folgt ein Überblick über den bislang erreichten Entwicklungsstand dieser relativ neuen Dienstleistung. Dabei werden die Vor- und Nachteile der technischen und organisatorischen Varianten erläutert. Schließlich richtet sich der Blick auf Qualitätskriterien zur Bewertung und Verbesserung digitaler Auskunft in der Praxis.
    Content
    "Die Ursprünge digitaler Auskunft reichen zurück in die 1980er Jahre. Aus bescheidenen Anfängen hat sich inzwischen eine bibliothekarische Standarddienstleistung entwickelt. Mit dem digitalen Umbruch stellten die Bibliotheken zunächst ihre Kataloge im Web für die Recherche bereit und boten FAQs zur Beantwortung von Standardfragen an. Um den vollen Umfang bibliothekarischer Dienstleistungen im Internet präsentieren zu können, bedurfte es darüber hinaus der Entwicklung eines Äquivalents für die klassische Auskunft im WWW. Die Entwicklung von digitaler Auskunft drängte sich aber nicht nur aus diesem Grund auf; das Web veränderte (und verändert) zudem die Informationskultur der Kunden; diese erwarten schnelleren und einfacheren Service. Alles soll so unmittelbar und so unkompliziert recherchierbar sein, wie man es von Google, Yahoo und anderen gewohnt ist. Außerdem hat die bibliothekarische Auskunft mit "Yahoo Clever" oder "Lycos IQ" kommerzielle Konkurrenten erhalten. Digitale Auskunft musste also als Antwort auf die Herausforderungen der kommerziellen Konkurrenz und der veränderten Benutzergewohnheiten schnell entwickelt werden. Denn nur so konnte und kann rechtzeitig unter Beweis gestellt werden, dass Bibliotheken für viele Auskunftsfälle gegenüber Suchmaschinen und Webkatalogen einen ungeheueren Vorteil besitzen: Die klassische und damit auch die digitale Auskunft zielt nicht darauf, die Fragen zu beantworten, die Benutzer stellen, sondern (idealerweise) darauf, ihnen die Informationen zu verschaffen, die sie tatsächlich benötigen.
    Schon in der ersten Hälfte des 20. Jahrhunderts war in der Praxis des Auskunftsdienstes in den USA bekannt geworden, dass Benutzer häufig nicht nach dem fragen was sie eigentlich suchen, sondern meist allgemeine und nicht selten irreführende Fragen stellen. Dafür ist die Technik des Auskunftsinterviews entwickelt worden, um gemeinsam mit dem Kunden zu ermitteln, welche Informationen exakt gesucht werden. Während Suchmaschinen nur die syntaktische und (in Ausnahmefällen) die semantische Ebene der gestellten Frage abarbeiten können, vermag bibliothekarische Auskunft einer dritten, nämlich jener pragmatischen Dimension gerecht zu werden. Anders ausgedrückt: Suchmaschinen und andere Navigationsinstrumente des Internet arbeiten objektorientiert, digitale Auskunft durch bibliothekarische Experten hingegen erbringt subjekt- bzw. kundenorientierte Dienstleistungen. Bibliotheken mit elaborierter digitaler Auskunft sind den Herausforderungen der Informationsgesellschaft damit gewachsen: ja sie sind noch unverzichtbarer als zuvor. Speziell in Deutschland allerdings ist es nicht damit getan, digitale Auskunft mit Engagement zu entwickeln. Darüber hinaus müssen große Anstrengungen unternommen werden, um die Leistungsfähigkeit dieser bibliothekarischen Dienstleistung in das Bewusstsein der realen und potentiellen Kunden zu rücken."
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.4, S.197-202
  20. Hawk, J.: OCLC SiteSearch (1998) 0.09
    0.088401735 = product of:
      0.35360694 = sum of:
        0.35360694 = weight(_text_:java in 3079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35360694 = score(doc=3079,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.4587406 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0650926 = queryNorm
            0.7708211 = fieldWeight in 3079, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3079)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Feature on OCLC's SiteSearch suite of software, first introduced in 1992, and how it is helping over 250 libraries integrate and manage their electronic library collections. Describes the new features of version 4.0, released in Apr 1997, which include a new interface, Java based architecture, and an online documentation and training site. Gives an account of how Java is helping the Georgia Library Learning Online (GALILEO) project to keep pace on the WWW; the use of SiteSearch by libraries to customize their interface to electronic resources; and gives details of Project Athena (Assessing Technological Horizons to Educate the Nashville Area), which is using OCLC SiteSearch to allow area library users to search the holdings of public and university libraries simultaneously

Languages

  • d 32
  • m 3
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 773
  • m 309
  • el 102
  • s 92
  • i 21
  • n 17
  • x 12
  • r 10
  • b 7
  • ? 1
  • v 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications