Search (8965 results, page 2 of 449)

0.13817354 = product of:
  0.27634707 = sum of:
    0.05273419 = weight(_text_:journal in 6243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05273419 = score(doc=6243,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21290474 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8022826 = idf(docFreq=7325, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.24768913 = fieldWeight in 6243, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8022826 = idf(docFreq=7325, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6243)
    0.22361287 = weight(_text_:headings in 6243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22361287 = score(doc=6243,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.36866346 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.60655016 = fieldWeight in 6243, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6243)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Examines concepts of language and power in relation to the history of the Australian aboriginal people. Libraries and abstracting and indexing services play an important role in controlling and interpreting history by the selction of articles, choice of language, e.g. thesauri, to provide access points and the application of subject headings. Uses the Australian Public Affairs Information Service (APAIS) subject headings and the APIS thesaurus (1990) to illustrate this process

Source

Australian library journal. 42(1993) no.1, S.27-32

0.13751346 = product of:
  0.27502692 = sum of:
    0.03295887 = weight(_text_:journal in 2794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03295887 = score(doc=2794,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21290474 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8022826 = idf(docFreq=7325, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.1548057 = fieldWeight in 2794, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8022826 = idf(docFreq=7325, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2794)
    0.24206804 = weight(_text_:headings in 2794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24206804 = score(doc=2794,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.36866346 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.6566098 = fieldWeight in 2794, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2794)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

In this article, we describe and test a two-stage algorithm based on a lexical collocation technique which maps from the lexical clues contained in a document representation into a controlled vocabulary list of subject headings. Using a collection of 4.626 INSPEC documents, we create a 'dictionary' of associations between the lexical items contained in the titles, authors, and abstracts, and controlled vocabulary subject headings assigned to those records by human indexers using a likelihood ratio statistic as the measure of association. In the deployment stage, we use the dictiony to predict which of the controlled vocabulary subject headings best describe new documents when they are presented to the system. Our evaluation of this algorithm, in which we compare the automatically assigned subject headings to the subject headings assigned to the test documents by human catalogers, shows that we can obtain results comparable to, and consistent with, human cataloging. In effect we have cast this as a classic partial match information retrieval problem. We consider the problem to be one of 'retrieving' (or assigning) the most probably 'relevant' (or correct) controlled vocabulary subject headings to a document based on the clues contained in that document

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.10, S.888-902

0.13516451 = product of:
  0.27032903 = sum of:
    0.046716142 = weight(_text_:und in 1528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046716142 = score(doc=1528,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16850592 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.2772374 = fieldWeight in 1528, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1528)
    0.22361287 = weight(_text_:headings in 1528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22361287 = score(doc=1528,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.36866346 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.60655016 = fieldWeight in 1528, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1528)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Discussion of the results and consequences of the automation project named thesaurus/concordance project, carried out at the DUT Library. The aim of the project was, by making the subject headings and their corresponding classification codes machine readable, to produce periodically cumulative lists, classifies lists, lists per subject fields, alphabetical lists of inverted subheadings and geographical names with their corresponding main headings and notations

Source

Numerische und nicht-numerische Klassifikation zwischen Theorie und Praxis. Proc. der 5. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Hofgeismar, 7.-10.4.1981. Hrsg.: Peter Ihm u.a

0.13178273 = product of:
  0.26356545 = sum of:
    0.06591774 = weight(_text_:journal in 885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06591774 = score(doc=885,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21290474 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8022826 = idf(docFreq=7325, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.3096114 = fieldWeight in 885, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8022826 = idf(docFreq=7325, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=885)
    0.19764772 = weight(_text_:headings in 885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19764772 = score(doc=885,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36866346 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.53611964 = fieldWeight in 885, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=885)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

An experimental online catalog was developed that provided searchers with several different subject searching strategies. Analyses of retrieval test data suggest that searchers expect alphabetical searches to provide lists of assigned subject headings conceptually related to their topics of interest. System designers can now respond to their expectation by incorporating LCSH-mr in online catalogs

Source

Journal of academic librarianship. 14(1989), S.353-360

0.13178273 = product of:
  0.26356545 = sum of:
    0.06591774 = weight(_text_:journal in 4735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06591774 = score(doc=4735,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21290474 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8022826 = idf(docFreq=7325, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.3096114 = fieldWeight in 4735, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8022826 = idf(docFreq=7325, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4735)
    0.19764772 = weight(_text_:headings in 4735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19764772 = score(doc=4735,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36866346 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.53611964 = fieldWeight in 4735, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4735)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Provides a list of 19 WWW and gopher sites from which answers to ready reference queries may be obtained. These are arranged under the following headings: ready made collections; date and time; weights and measures; flag wavers; foreign currency; state by state; the elements; and case and tense

Source

School library journal. 42(1996) no.1, S.42

0.13178273 = product of:
  0.26356545 = sum of:
    0.06591774 = weight(_text_:journal in 5064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06591774 = score(doc=5064,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21290474 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8022826 = idf(docFreq=7325, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.3096114 = fieldWeight in 5064, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8022826 = idf(docFreq=7325, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5064)
    0.19764772 = weight(_text_:headings in 5064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19764772 = score(doc=5064,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36866346 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.53611964 = fieldWeight in 5064, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5064)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This communication examines some of the most frequently cited critisms of keyword indexing. These critisms include (1) absence of general subject headings, (2) limited entry points, and (3) irrelevant indexing. Some solutions are suggested to meet these critisms.

Source

Journal of the American society for information science. 32(1981), S.71-72

0.13178273 = product of:
  0.26356545 = sum of:
    0.06591774 = weight(_text_:journal in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06591774 = score(doc=1436,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21290474 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8022826 = idf(docFreq=7325, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.3096114 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8022826 = idf(docFreq=7325, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
    0.19764772 = weight(_text_:headings in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19764772 = score(doc=1436,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36866346 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.53611964 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Articles are grouped under the following headings: business services and the Internet; networking; feature column; government information sources; and special reports

Footnote

Rez. in: Australian library journal 47(1998) no.4, S.414-415 (S.L. Edwards)

0.13177218 = product of:
  0.26354435 = sum of:
    0.026367094 = weight(_text_:journal in 384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026367094 = score(doc=384,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21290474 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8022826 = idf(docFreq=7325, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.123844564 = fieldWeight in 384, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8022826 = idf(docFreq=7325, maxDocs=44421)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=384)
    0.23717727 = weight(_text_:headings in 384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23717727 = score(doc=384,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.36866346 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 384, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=384)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This short guide is intended to help librarians and OPAC system designers to make decisions about the design of displays of more than one subject heading. The authors stress that they offer guidance rather than standards or prescriptions; their clear prose is cautious and even the number of recommendations is limited. A 12-page introduction contrasts the "structural approach" and "strict alphabetical approach" to filing, showing examples and stating arguments for each. 7 chapters cover display of subdivisions, inverted headings, display of qualified headings, arrangement of numerical headings, display of subjects interfiled with names and titles, punctuation and messages to the user. Within each chapter, questions involving choices between two or more approaches are followed by brief statements of current practice (LC rules, ALA rules, and systems in existing OPACs) extensive examples demonstrating such choices, and arguments for and against each. The authors warn against ever assuming that the user knows the needed subject headings, and acknowledge that the best OPAC design often depends on the setting and on the user's understanding of the system. Although the topic may be beyond the purview of the authoring committee, the discussion here makes one yearn for interactive OPACs that can analyze the user's needs and provide appropriate guidance to whatever system is adopted

Editor

Subcommittee on the Display of Subject Headings in Subject Indexes in OPACs, Subject Analysis Committee, Cataloging and Classification Section, ALCTS, ALA

Footnote

Hinweis in: Journal of academic librarianship 18(1993) no.6, S.401

LCSH

Subject headings, Library of Congress / Evaluation

Subject

Subject headings, Library of Congress / Evaluation

0.13097613 = product of:
  0.26195225 = sum of:
    0.024774972 = weight(_text_:und in 6600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024774972 = score(doc=6600,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16850592 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 6600, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6600)
    0.23717727 = weight(_text_:headings in 6600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23717727 = score(doc=6600,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.36866346 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 6600, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6600)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The history of the Library of Congress Subject Headings is traced, from its beginnings with the implementation of a dictionary catalog at the Library of Congress in 1898 to the present day. The author describes the most significant changes which have occurred in LCSH policies and practices during the 100-year period. Events noted near the end of the century indicate an increased willingness on the part of' the Library of Congress to involve the larger library community in the creation or revision of subject headings and other decision-making regarding the LCSH system. Finally, the author provides a summary of the other contributions to this collection of essays, a collection which celebrates the "centennial" of the world's most popular library subject heading language

Content

Mit einer Publikationsgeschichte der LCSH (vgl. Tabellen) und dazu gehörenden Publikationen

Source

The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone

0.13097613 = product of:
  0.26195225 = sum of:
    0.024774972 = weight(_text_:und in 6921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024774972 = score(doc=6921,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16850592 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 6921, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6921)
    0.23717727 = weight(_text_:headings in 6921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23717727 = score(doc=6921,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.36866346 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 6921, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6921)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Surveys conducted during the last four years under the auspices of the International Federation of Library Associations and Organizations (IFLA) reveal that the Library of Congress Subject Headings is heavily used in national libraries outside of the United States, particularly in English-speaking countries. Many other countries report using a translation or adaptation of LCSH as their principal subject heading language. Magda Heiner-Freiling presents an analysis of the IFLA data, which also includes information on the classification schemes used by the libraries and whether or not the libraries have produced a manual on the creation and application of subject headings. The paper concludes with an Appendix showing the complete data from the 88 national libraries that respond to the surveys

Content

Mit einer tabellarischen Übersicht der eingesetzten Systeme und Regeln

Object

Sears List of Subject Headings

Source

The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone

0.1283231 = product of:
  0.2566462 = sum of:
    0.0330333 = weight(_text_:und in 254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0330333 = score(doc=254,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16850592 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.19603643 = fieldWeight in 254, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=254)
    0.22361287 = weight(_text_:headings in 254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22361287 = score(doc=254,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.36866346 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.60655016 = fieldWeight in 254, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=254)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

LCSH

Subject headings / Terminology

Subject

Subject headings / Terminology

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.1283231 = product of:
  0.2566462 = sum of:
    0.0330333 = weight(_text_:und in 3850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0330333 = score(doc=3850,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16850592 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.19603643 = fieldWeight in 3850, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3850)
    0.22361287 = weight(_text_:headings in 3850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22361287 = score(doc=3850,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.36866346 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.60655016 = fieldWeight in 3850, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3850)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Enthält in einem Appendix A: 'Guidelines on subject access to individual works of fiction, drama, etc.' des American Library Association Subject Analysis Committee; und in einem Appendix B die Verfahrensweise der Library of Congress bei der Zuteilung von Library of Congress Subject Headings zur Schönen Literatur

0.1283231 = product of:
  0.2566462 = sum of:
    0.0330333 = weight(_text_:und in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0330333 = score(doc=1130,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16850592 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.19603643 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
    0.22361287 = weight(_text_:headings in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22361287 = score(doc=1130,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.36866346 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.60655016 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

LCSH

Subject headings / Terminology

Subject

Subject headings / Terminology

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.12802145 = product of:
  0.2560429 = sum of:
    0.058395177 = weight(_text_:und in 199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058395177 = score(doc=199,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16850592 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.34654674 = fieldWeight in 199, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=199)
    0.19764772 = weight(_text_:headings in 199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19764772 = score(doc=199,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36866346 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.53611964 = fieldWeight in 199, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=199)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Classification

AN 75000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Allgemeines

RVK

AN 75000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Allgemeines

0.12090184 = product of:
  0.24180368 = sum of:
    0.046142414 = weight(_text_:journal in 1603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046142414 = score(doc=1603,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21290474 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8022826 = idf(docFreq=7325, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.21672799 = fieldWeight in 1603, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8022826 = idf(docFreq=7325, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1603)
    0.19566126 = weight(_text_:headings in 1603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19566126 = score(doc=1603,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.36866346 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.5307314 = fieldWeight in 1603, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1603)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

We have investigated the relative merits of searching on titles, subject headings, abstracts, free-language terms, and combinations of these elements. The COMPENDEX data base was used for this study since it combined all of these data elements of interest. In general, the results obtained from the experiments indicate that, as expected, titles alone are not satisfactory for efficient retrieval. The combination of titles and abstracts came the closest to 100% retrieval, with searching of abstracts alone doing almost as well. Indexer input, although necessary for 100% retrieval in almost all cases, was found to be relatively unimportant

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 26(1975), S.223-229

0.12090184 = product of:
  0.24180368 = sum of:
    0.046142414 = weight(_text_:journal in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046142414 = score(doc=109,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21290474 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8022826 = idf(docFreq=7325, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.21672799 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8022826 = idf(docFreq=7325, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
    0.19566126 = weight(_text_:headings in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19566126 = score(doc=109,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.36866346 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.5307314 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This article describes FAST, the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology, a project at OCLC to make Library of Congress Subject Headings easier to use in Dublin Core metadata by breaking out facets of space, time, and form. Work on FAST can be watched at its web site, http://www.miskatonic.org/library/, which has recent presentations and reports. It is interesting to see facets and Dublin Core combined, though both LCSH and FAST subject headings are beyond what most people making a small faceted classification would want or need.

Source

Journal of Internet cataloging. 4(2001) nos.1/2, S.35-47

0.12081135 = product of:
  0.2416227 = sum of:
    0.020645812 = weight(_text_:und in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020645812 = score(doc=1648,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16850592 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.12252277 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
    0.22097689 = weight(_text_:headings in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22097689 = score(doc=1648,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.36866346 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.59940004 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Within the multilingual framework of the CrissCross project, MACS (Multilingual Access to Subjects) has continued its work. MACS has developed a prototype of mappings between three vocabularies: the LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings), RAMEAU (Répertoire d'autorité-matière encyclopédique et alphabétique unifié) and the SWD (Schlagwortnormdatei). A database with a Link Management System (LMI), which allows for an easy linking between English, French and German subject headings, was created. The database started working with headings from the disciplines sports and theatre, but by now headings from all other fields of knowledge have been included as well. In 2008-2010, equivalencies between English and French headings which had been produced by the Bibliothèque nationale de France have been completed with the most important German SWD topical terms. Thus, more than 50.000 trilingual links are now available and can be used in different retrieval scenarios. It is planned to use them in The European Library (TEL) in order to support multilingual searches over all European National Library collections. The article informs about the project workflow, methodology of mapping and future applications of MACS links.

Series

Bibliotheca Academica - Reihe Informations- und Bibliothekswissenschaften; Bd. 1

0.11946967 = product of:
  0.23893934 = sum of:
    0.041291624 = weight(_text_:und in 5233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041291624 = score(doc=5233,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16850592 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.24504554 = fieldWeight in 5233, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5233)
    0.19764772 = weight(_text_:headings in 5233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19764772 = score(doc=5233,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36866346 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.53611964 = fieldWeight in 5233, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5233)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Footnote

Bezugnahme auf: 'Subject cataloging manual: subject headings. 4th ed. Washington 1991' und Vorläufer

0.11946967 = product of:
  0.23893934 = sum of:
    0.041291624 = weight(_text_:und in 4058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041291624 = score(doc=4058,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16850592 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.24504554 = fieldWeight in 4058, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4058)
    0.19764772 = weight(_text_:headings in 4058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19764772 = score(doc=4058,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36866346 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.53611964 = fieldWeight in 4058, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4058)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Eine Einführung in der Probleme der Formal- und Inhaltserschließung

Content

Revised to take account of the 1988 revision of AACR2, the publication of new ISBD texts, the changed format of LC subject headings and progress in computer applications

0.11862028 = product of:
  0.23724055 = sum of:
    0.11865192 = weight(_text_:journal in 3840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11865192 = score(doc=3840,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.21290474 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8022826 = idf(docFreq=7325, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.5573005 = fieldWeight in 3840, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.8022826 = idf(docFreq=7325, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3840)
    0.118588634 = weight(_text_:headings in 3840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.118588634 = score(doc=3840,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36866346 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.07597547 = queryNorm
        0.32167178 = fieldWeight in 3840, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3840)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This paper explores the ISI Journal Citation Reports (JCR) bibliographic and subject structures through Library of Congress (LC) and American research libraries cataloging and classification methodology. The 2006 Science Citation Index JCR Behavioral Sciences subject category journals are used as an example. From the library perspective, the main fault of the JCR bibliographic structure is that the JCR mistakenly identifies journal title segments as journal bibliographic entities, seriously affecting journal rankings by total cites and the impact factor. In respect to JCR subject structure, the title segment, which constitutes the JCR bibliographic basis, is posited as the best bibliographic entity for the citation measurement of journal subject relationships. Through factor analysis and other methods, the JCR subject categorization of journals is tested against their LC subject headings and classification. The finding is that JCR and library journal subject analyses corroborate, clarify, and correct each other.

Object

Journal Citation Report

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.6, S.1097-1117