Search (1451 results, page 11 of 73)

0.046842884 = product of:
  0.18737154 = sum of:
    0.18737154 = weight(_text_:heading in 1669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18737154 = score(doc=1669,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40051475 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06621197 = queryNorm
        0.4678268 = fieldWeight in 1669, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1669)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

As the literature in both knowledge organization and knowledge management continues to flourish and address issues common to both fields, it becomes more difficult to delineate the boundaries of each discipline. By exploring the relationship between them, as well as the knowledge environment within which a knowledge management system must operate, it is clear that much of the functionality subsumed under the heading of knowledge management requires a strong knowledge organization foundation to support it. By understanding the differences between these two disciplines, as well as the areas of inquiry within knowledge organization that are essential to the successful implementation of knowledge management systems, a wide field of fruitful research directions becomes apparent for both knowledge organization and knowledge management researchers.

0.046842884 = product of:
  0.18737154 = sum of:
    0.18737154 = weight(_text_:heading in 1799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18737154 = score(doc=1799,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40051475 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06621197 = queryNorm
        0.4678268 = fieldWeight in 1799, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1799)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

In current cataloging practice, the identification of an item as a member of a particular work set is accomplished by assigning a main entry heading, or main entry citation, in the bibliographic record representing that item. The main entry citation is normally comprised of a primary author name and the uniform title associated with the work. However, the quality of bibliographic records varies, and this means of identification is not universally used by catalogers. Thus, consistent identification and retrieval of records representing editions of works is not guaranteed. Research is reported that investigates the extent to which records that are members of a particular work set may be automatically identified as such.

0.046842884 = product of:
  0.18737154 = sum of:
    0.18737154 = weight(_text_:heading in 3232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18737154 = score(doc=3232,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40051475 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06621197 = queryNorm
        0.4678268 = fieldWeight in 3232, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3232)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

We developed a project utilizing the local form/genre heading, "property data," and specific subheadings to help chemists, engineers, and those librarians assisting them to more easily locate library resources containing chemical and physical properties of substances. This article describes the project and examines possibilities for improving access to physical sciences literature in relation to Library of Congress Subject Headings and ongoing developments in authority records for form/genre terms. It also introduces functionality of such headings in the new "next generation" catalogs.

0.046842884 = product of:
  0.18737154 = sum of:
    0.18737154 = weight(_text_:heading in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18737154 = score(doc=587,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40051475 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06621197 = queryNorm
        0.4678268 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Evaluative and comparative studies of catalog data have tended to focus on methods that are labor intensive, demand expertise, and can examine only a limited number of records. This study explores an alternative approach to gathering and analyzing catalog data, focusing on the currency and consistency of controlled headings. The resulting data provide insight into libraries' use of changed headings and their success in maintaining currency and consistency, and the systems needed to support the current pace of heading changes.

0.046842884 = product of:
  0.18737154 = sum of:
    0.18737154 = weight(_text_:heading in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18737154 = score(doc=698,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40051475 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06621197 = queryNorm
        0.4678268 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

After an introduction that addresses the means people use to search for information, this entry articulates the principles underlying various subject access options, including both controlled vocabulary systems and classification. It begins with a brief history of subject access provisions, including an account of the impact of automation, and goes on to discuss in some detail the principles underlying American library practice in respect to subject access. It then, briefly, describes selected subject-access schemes (including both subject heading lists and classification systems) in terms of how they reflect the principles presented, and how well they fulfill their stated functions.

0.046842884 = product of:
  0.18737154 = sum of:
    0.18737154 = weight(_text_:heading in 1827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18737154 = score(doc=1827,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40051475 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06621197 = queryNorm
        0.4678268 = fieldWeight in 1827, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1827)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

"dwibindu vargiikaraNa" is the Kannada rendering of the revised Colon Classification, 7th Edition, intended essentially for the classification of macro documents. This paper discusses the planning, preparation, and features of Colon Classification (CC) in Kannada, one of the major Indian languages as well as the Official Language of Karnataka, and uploading the CC on the web. Linguistic issues related to the Kannada rendering are discussed with possible solutions. It creates facilities in the field of Indexing Language (IL) to prepare products such as, Subject Heading List, Information Retrieval Thesaurus, and creation of subject glossaries or updating the available subject dictionaries in Kannada.

0.046842884 = product of:
  0.18737154 = sum of:
    0.18737154 = weight(_text_:heading in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18737154 = score(doc=3599,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40051475 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06621197 = queryNorm
        0.4678268 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The US cataloging community is an interorganizational network with the Library of Congress (LC) as the lead organization, which reserves to itself the power to shape cataloging rules. Peripheral members of the network who are interested in modifying changes to the rules or to the network can use various strategies for organizational change that incorporate building ties to the decision-makers located at the hub of the network. The story of William E. Studwell's campaign for a subject heading code illustrates how some traditional scholarly methods of urging change-papers and presentations-are insufficient to achieve reform in an interorganizational network, absent strategies to build alliances with the decision makers.

0.046842884 = product of:
  0.18737154 = sum of:
    0.18737154 = weight(_text_:heading in 529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18737154 = score(doc=529,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40051475 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06621197 = queryNorm
        0.4678268 = fieldWeight in 529, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=529)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This article examines the classification of migration and the political implications of its vocabulary. It begins with an analysis of the challenge that the topic of migration poses to traditional methods of classification. These challenges are evident in the case study of the 2016 petition to change the subject heading of "Illegal aliens" at the Library of Congress, the Library's proposal to replace the term with "noncitizens" and "illegal immigration," and subsequent pressure from the House of Representatives to reinstate the original phrasing in order to match the terminology of federal laws.

0.046842884 = product of:
  0.18737154 = sum of:
    0.18737154 = weight(_text_:heading in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18737154 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40051475 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06621197 = queryNorm
        0.4678268 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This research concerns the frequency of the assignment of author-supplied keyword strings and cataloger supplied subject heading strings within a library catalog. The results reveal that, on average, more author-assigned keywords and more cataloger-assigned Library of Congress Subject Headings were assigned to works emerging from the arts & humanities than to works emerging from the social sciences and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. STEM disciplines in particular received a lower amount of topical metadata, in part because of the under-assignment of name/title, geographical, and corporate subject headings. These findings reveal how librarians could increase their understanding of how topical access is functioning within academic disciplines.

0.046842884 = product of:
  0.18737154 = sum of:
    0.18737154 = weight(_text_:heading in 2181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18737154 = score(doc=2181,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40051475 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06621197 = queryNorm
        0.4678268 = fieldWeight in 2181, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2181)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This article discusses the practical application of faceted vocabularies to the cataloging of textbooks. Consistent application of faceted vocabularies, specifically Library of Congress Genre/Form Terms for Library and Archival Materials (LCGFT) and Library of Congress Demographic Group Terms (LCDGT), would enhance the discovery of these resources. Alternatives to special cases in Subject Heading Manual H 2187 are proposed. A case study demonstrating the application of LCDGT is provided. Figures illustrate the results of the proposed best practices. The article includes four tables that are designed to streamline term assignments. Consistent cataloging of genre and audience prepares legacy records for future automated enhancement.

0.046362434 = product of:
  0.18544973 = sum of:
    0.18544973 = weight(_text_:heading in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18544973 = score(doc=366,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.40051475 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06621197 = queryNorm
        0.46302846 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: BACKGROUND: Alva T STONE: The LCSH Century: A Brief History of the Library of Congress Subject Headings, and Introduction to the Centennial Essays - THEORY AND PRINCIPLES: Elaine SVENONIUS: LCSH: Semantics, Syntax and Specificity; Heidi Lee HOERMAN u. Kevin A. FURNISS: Turning Practice into Principles: A Comparison of the IFLA: Principles Underlying Subject Heading Languages (SHLs) and the Principles Underlying the Library of Congress Subject Headings System; Hope A. OLSON: Difference, Culture and Change:The Untapped Potential of LCSH - ONLINE ENVIRONMENT: Pauline Atherton COCHRANE: Improving LCSH for Use in Online Catalogs Revisited-What Progress Has Been Made? What Issues Still Remain?; Gregory WOOL: Filing and Precoordination: How Subject Headings Are Displayed in Online Catalogs and Why It Matters; Stephen HEARN: Machine-Assisted Validation of LC Subject Headings: Implications for Authority File Structure - SPECIFIC PERSPECTIVES: Thomas MANN: Teaching Library of Congress Subject Headings; Louisa J. KREIDER: LCSH Works! Subject Searching Effectiveness at the Cleveland Public Library and the Growth of Library of Congress Subject Headings Through Cooperation; Harriette HEMMASI u J. Bradford YOUNG: LCSH for Music: Historical and Empirical Perspectives; Joseph MILLER u. Patricia KUHR: LCSH and Periodical Indexing: Adoption vs. Adaptation; David P MILLER: Out from Under: Form/Genre Access in LCSH - WORLD VIEW: Magda HEINER-FREILING: Survey on Subject Heading Languages Used in National Libraries and Bibliographies; Andrew MacEWAN: Crossing Language Barriers in Europe: Linking LCSH to Other Subject Heading Languages; Alvaro QUIJANO-SOLIS u.a.: Automated Authority Files of Spanish-Language Subject Headings - FUTURE PROSPECTS: Lois Mai CHAN u. Theodora HODGES: Entering the Millennium: a new century for LCSH

0.045548838 = product of:
  0.091097675 = sum of:
    0.010795589 = weight(_text_:und in 4726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010795589 = score(doc=4726,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14685147 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06621197 = queryNorm
        0.07351366 = fieldWeight in 4726, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4726)
    0.08030209 = weight(_text_:heading in 4726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08030209 = score(doc=4726,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40051475 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06621197 = queryNorm
        0.20049721 = fieldWeight in 4726, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4726)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

"Thesaurus" definitions taken from the information science literature "A thesaurus is a controlled vocabulary arranged in a known order and structured so that equivalence, homographic, hierarchical, and associative relationships among terms are displayed clearly and identified by standardized relationship indicators that are employed reciprocally." (ANSI/NISO Z39-19-1993) "Thesaurus is a specialized, normalized, postcoordinate language used for documentaries means, where the linguistic elements that composes it - single or composed terms - are related among themselves syntactically and semantically." (Translated into English by the authors from the original in Portuguese: Currás 1995, 88.) "[...] an authority file, which can lead the user from one concept to another via various heuristic or intuitive paths." (Howerton 1965 apud Gilchrist 1971, 5) " [...] is a lexical authority list, without notation, which differs from an alphabetical subject heading list in that the lexical units, being smaller, are more amenable to post-coordinate indexing." (Gilchrist 1971,2) [...] "a dynamic controlled vocabulary of terms related semantically and by generic relation covering a specific knowledge domain." (Translated into English by the authors from the original in Portuguese: UNESCO 1973, 6.) [...] "a terminological control device used in the translation of the natural language of the documents, from the indexers or from the users in a more restricted system language (documentation language, information language)." (Translated into English by the authors from the original in Portuguese: UNESCO 1973,6.)

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.04541744 = product of:
  0.18166976 = sum of:
    0.18166976 = weight(_text_:java in 1871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18166976 = score(doc=1871,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.46662933 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06621197 = queryNorm
        0.38932347 = fieldWeight in 1871, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1871)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

As part of the ongoing Illinois Digital Library Initiative project, this research proposes an intelligent agent approach to Web searching. In this experiment, we developed 2 Web personal spiders based on best first search and genetic algorithm techniques, respectively. These personal spiders can dynamically take a user's selected starting homepages and search for the most closely related homepages in the Web, based on the links and keyword indexing. A graphical, dynamic, Jav-based interface was developed and is available for Web access. A system architecture for implementing such an agent-spider is presented, followed by deteiled discussions of benchmark testing and user evaluation results. In benchmark testing, although the genetic algorithm spider did not outperform the best first search spider, we found both results to be comparable and complementary. In user evaluation, the genetic algorithm spider obtained significantly higher recall value than that of the best first search spider. However, their precision values were not statistically different. The mutation process introduced in genetic algorithms allows users to find other potential relevant homepages that cannot be explored via a conventional local search process. In addition, we found the Java-based interface to be a necessary component for design of a truly interactive and dynamic Web agent

0.04541744 = product of:
  0.18166976 = sum of:
    0.18166976 = weight(_text_:java in 272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18166976 = score(doc=272,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.46662933 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06621197 = queryNorm
        0.38932347 = fieldWeight in 272, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=272)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This article describes the latest development of a generic approach to detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. The work makes substantial theoretical and methodological contributions to progressive knowledge domain visualization. A specialty is conceptualized and visualized as a time-variant duality between two fundamental concepts in information science: research fronts and intellectual bases. A research front is defined as an emergent and transient grouping of concepts and underlying research issues. The intellectual base of a research front is its citation and co-citation footprint in scientific literature - an evolving network of scientific publications cited by research-front concepts. Kleinberg's (2002) burst-detection algorithm is adapted to identify emergent research-front concepts. Freeman's (1979) betweenness centrality metric is used to highlight potential pivotal points of paradigm shift over time. Two complementary visualization views are designed and implemented: cluster views and time-zone views. The contributions of the approach are that (a) the nature of an intellectual base is algorithmically and temporally identified by emergent research-front terms, (b) the value of a co-citation cluster is explicitly interpreted in terms of research-front concepts, and (c) visually prominent and algorithmically detected pivotal points substantially reduce the complexity of a visualized network. The modeling and visualization process is implemented in CiteSpace II, a Java application, and applied to the analysis of two research fields: mass extinction (1981-2004) and terrorism (1990-2003). Prominent trends and pivotal points in visualized networks were verified in collaboration with domain experts, who are the authors of pivotal-point articles. Practical implications of the work are discussed. A number of challenges and opportunities for future studies are identified.

0.04541744 = product of:
  0.18166976 = sum of:
    0.18166976 = weight(_text_:java in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18166976 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.46662933 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06621197 = queryNorm
        0.38932347 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

How the Internet Works promises "an exciting visual journey down the highways and byways of the Internet," and it delivers. The book's high quality graphics and simple, succinct text make it the ideal book for beginners; however it still has much to offer for Net vets. This book is jam- packed with cool ways to visualize how the Net works. The first section visually explores how TCP/IP, Winsock, and other Net connectivity mysteries work. This section also helps you understand how e-mail addresses and domains work, what file types mean, and how information travels across the Net. Part 2 unravels the Net's underlying architecture, including good information on how routers work and what is meant by client/server architecture. The third section covers your own connection to the Net through an Internet Service Provider (ISP), and how ISDN, cable modems, and Web TV work. Part 4 discusses e-mail, spam, newsgroups, Internet Relay Chat (IRC), and Net phone calls. In part 5, you'll find out how other Net tools, such as gopher, telnet, WAIS, and FTP, can enhance your Net experience. The sixth section takes on the World Wide Web, including everything from how HTML works to image maps and forms. Part 7 looks at other Web features such as push technology, Java, ActiveX, and CGI scripting, while part 8 deals with multimedia on the Net. Part 9 shows you what intranets are and covers groupware, and shopping and searching the Net. The book wraps up with part 10, a chapter on Net security that covers firewalls, viruses, cookies, and other Web tracking devices, plus cryptography and parental controls.

0.04541744 = product of:
  0.18166976 = sum of:
    0.18166976 = weight(_text_:java in 4179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18166976 = score(doc=4179,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.46662933 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06621197 = queryNorm
        0.38932347 = fieldWeight in 4179, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4179)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

In order to improve the organization of classical music information resources, we constructed a classical music recording ontology, on top of which we then designed an online classical music catalog. Our construction of the classical music recording ontology consisted of three steps: identifying the purpose, analyzing the ontology, and encoding the ontology. We identified the main classes and properties of the domain by investigating classical music recording resources and users' information needs. We implemented the ontology in the Web Ontology Language (OWL) using five steps: transforming the properties, encoding the transformed properties, defining ranges of the properties, constructing individuals, and standardizing the ontology. In constructing the online catalog, we first designed the structure and functions of the catalog based on investigations into users' information needs and information-seeking behaviors. Then we extracted classes and properties of the ontology using the Apache Jena application programming interface (API), and constructed a catalog in the Java environment. The catalog provides a hierarchical main page (built using the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model), a classical music information network and integrated information service; this combination of features greatly eases the task of finding classical music recordings and more information about classical music.

0.040151045 = product of:
  0.16060418 = sum of:
    0.16060418 = weight(_text_:heading in 1196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16060418 = score(doc=1196,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40051475 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06621197 = queryNorm
        0.40099442 = fieldWeight in 1196, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1196)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The PRECIS system of subject headings was designed for use with a computer-produced subject index. Accordingly, the routines of subject heading work are clearly differentiated into clerical procedures and those that require judgement. The clerical procedures can be accomplished largely through the use of computer programs. The subject headings represent a unique combination of several different characteristics. As a result the system permits several coextensive forms of a subject name for each work. The allowable forms of subject name are restricted somewhat by the constraints of the system but the final choice amongst the various alternatives is made by the subject analyst. Often, this choice reflects his or her usage rather than any attempt to realize an explicit code for subject names. There is some evidence that this judgement varies in individual cases. Moreover, there is no empirical evidence that the alternatives permitted do reflect user convenience - although, in fact, this may be true

0.040151045 = product of:
  0.16060418 = sum of:
    0.16060418 = weight(_text_:heading in 6919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16060418 = score(doc=6919,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40051475 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06621197 = queryNorm
        0.40099442 = fieldWeight in 6919, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6919)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The contents of scientific and technical handbooks often needs fast, reliable and precise subject access, even if the searcher is not familiar with the terminology of the book and has not read it beforehand. This requires careful and expert subject indexing in a highly specific indexing vocabulary, as well as the presentation of the resulting index in a lucid, conceptually transparent manner in print and on disk. Index users, when looking up a general subject heading, often ignore the necessity of looking up the appertaining hierarchically subordinate, more specific subject headings, too. They are either not made aware of these subject headings or their use is felt to be too cumbersome. A classifies approach to computerized subject indexing is described which resembles Ranganathan's Classified Catalogue. Through a variety of peculiarities it leads the searcher rapidly and easily to all subject headings related to a primarily chosen one, and to the postings under all these headings

0.040151045 = product of:
  0.16060418 = sum of:
    0.16060418 = weight(_text_:heading in 3792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16060418 = score(doc=3792,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40051475 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06621197 = queryNorm
        0.40099442 = fieldWeight in 3792, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3792)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The assumption of topic matching between user needs and texts topically relevant to those needs is often erroneous. Reports an emprical investigantion of the question 'what relationship types actually account for topical relevance'? In order to avoid the bias to topic matching search strategies, user needs are back generated from a randomly selected subset of the subject headings employed in a user oriented topical concordance. The corresponding relevant texts are those indicated in the concordance under the subject heading. Compares the topics of the user needs with the topics of the relevant texts to determine the relationships between them. Topical relevance relationships include a large variety of relationships, only some of which are matching relationships. Others are examples of paradigmatic or syntagmatic relationships. There appear to be no constraints on the kinds of relationships that can function as topical relevance relationships. They are distinguishable from other types of relationships only on functional grounds

0.040151045 = product of:
  0.16060418 = sum of:
    0.16060418 = weight(_text_:heading in 4554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16060418 = score(doc=4554,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40051475 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06621197 = queryNorm
        0.40099442 = fieldWeight in 4554, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4554)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reports 2 experiments that investigated the semantic distance model (SDM) of relevance assessment. In the 1st experiment graduate students of mathematics and economics assessed the relevance relationships between bibliographic records and hierarchies of terms composed of classification heading or help menu terms. The relevance assessments of the classification headings, but not the help menu terms, exhibited both a semantic distance effect and a semantic direction effect as predicted by the SDM. Topical subject expertise enhanced both these effects. The 2nd experiment investigates whether the poor performance of the help menu terms are an experimental design artifact reflecting the comparison of terse help terms with verbose classification headings. In the 2nd experiment the help menu terms were compared to a hierarchy of single word terms where they exhibited both a semantic distance and semantic direction effect